Semantic retrieval of spoken words with an obliterated initial phoneme in a sentence context

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 408, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 220-225

  Sivonen, Päivi ^a,b   Maess, Burkhard ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Gap; N1; N400; Phonemic restoration; Semantic processing; Speech

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CONTENT ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RATE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33749505634     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alcaini M., Giard M.H., Thévenet M., and Pernier J. Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. Psychophysiology 31 (1994) 611-615
2. Besson M., Faita F., Czternasty C., and Kutas M. What's in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences. Biol. Psychol. 46 (1997) 3-23
3. Connolly J.F., and Phillips N.A. Event-related components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6 (1994) 256-266
4. Kutas M., and Federmeier K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 463-470
5. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25 (1987) 71-102
6. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognit. Psychol. 18 (1986) 1-86
7. Morton J. Word recognition. In: Morton J., and Marshall J.D. (Eds). Psycholinguistics 2: structures and processes (1979), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 109-156
8. Norris D. Short list: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52 (1994) 189-234
9. Näätänen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 375-425
10. Samuel A.G. Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychol. Sci. 12 (2001) 348-351
11. Shailer M.J., and Moore B.C. Gap detection and the auditory filter: phase effects using sinusoidal stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81 (1987) 1110-1117
12. van den Brink D., Brown C.M., and Hagoort P. Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 967-985
13. Van Petten C., Coulson S., Rubin S., Plante E., and Parks M. Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25 (1999) 394-417
14. Warren R.M. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167 (1970) 392-393
15. Warren R.M. Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds. Psychol. Bull. 96 (1984) 371-383
16. Warren R.M., and Obusek C.J. Speech perception and phonemic restorations. Percept. Psychophys. 9 (1971) 358-362
17. Warren R.M., and Sherman G.L. Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context. Percept. Psychophys. 16 (1974) 150-156
18. Zwitserlood P. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32 (1989) 25-64