Superstructure deck effectiveness of the generic ship types - A concept design methodology

Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean, IMAM 2005 - Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Ocean and Coastal Resources

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 579-588

  Zanic, V ^a   Andric, J ^a   Prebeg, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE; CONCEPT DESIGNS; CRUISE SHIPS; DECISION SUPPORTS; FE MODELS; FEM MODELS; LIVESTOCK CARRIERS; MACRO-ELEMENTS; OPTIMIZATION METHODS; PRIMARY STRENGTHS; STRUCTURAL INTERACTIONS;

AGRICULTURE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; OCEAN ENGINEERING; OCEANOGRAPHY; TANKS (CONTAINERS); WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

DECKS (SHIP);

EID: 33749504435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Andreau, C, Gillet, L. (1988.) Structural Design Improvements of Passenger Ships, IMAS 88, The Design and Development of Passenger Ships.
2. Caldwell, J. B. (1957.) The Effect Of Superstructure On The Longitudinal Strength Of Ships, R.I.N.A. Transactions. Grubisic, I., Zanic, V., Trincas, G. (1997.) Sensitivity of MultiattributeMult-iattribute Design to Economy Enviroment: Shortsea Ro-Ro Vessels, Proc. of Int. Marine Design Conf. IMDC'97.
3. Gudmunsen, M. J. (1995.) Some Aspects of Modern Cruise Ship Structural Design, Cruise Shipbuilding in the USA, Lloyd's Register of Shipping.
4. Heder, M., Ulfvarson, A. (1991.) Hull Beam Behaviour of Passenger Ships, Marine Structure,Vol 4, pp. 17-34.
5. Hughes, O. F., Mistree, F., Zanic, V. (1980.) A Practical Method for the Rational Design of Ship Structures, Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 24.
6. Krueger, S. (2001.) Competitive Ro-Ro-Ships by First Principle Design Tools, Euroconference on Passenger Ship Design, Construction, Safety and Operation, Crete, Greece.
7. Mackney, M. D. A., Ross, C. T. F. (1999.) Superstructure Effectiveness in the Preliminary Assessment of the Hull Behavior, Marine Technology, Vol 36, No.l, pp. 29-44. MAESTRO Version 8.6. (2004.) Program documentation,
8. Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD, USA. Montgomery, D. C. (1991.) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley.
9. Proc. of 13th Int. Ship and Offshore Structures Congresses (ISSC):,
10. Proc. of 15th Int. Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, 2003, San Diego, USA. (1997), Trondheim, Norway, and (2003), San Diego, USA.
11. Thoft-Chrisiansen, Murotsu, Y. (1986.) Application of Structural Systems Reliability Theory, Springer.Verlag.
12. Zanic, V, Andric, J., Frank, D. (2003.) Structural Optimization Method for the Concept Design of Ship Structures, International Marine Design Conference, IMDC 2003, Athens, Greece, Vol 2, pp. 205-218.
13. Zanić, V, Das, P.K., Pu, Y., Faulkner, D. (1993.) Multiple criteria synthesis techniques applied to reliability based design of SWATH ship structure, Integrity of Offshore Structures 5, EMAS Scientific Publications, Glasgow, UK.
14. Zanic, V., Jancijev, T., Trincas, G., Nabergoj, R., Andric J. (2001.) Structural Design Methodology for Large RoRo/Passenger Ships, Journal of Ship and Ocean Technology, Vol 5, No.l, pp.14-29.
15. Zanic.V., Prebeg, P. (2004.) Primary response assessment method for concept design of monotonous thin-walled structures, Int. Conf. on Advanced Eng. Design, Glasgow, UK, p.l-l0.structures, Int. Conf. on Advanced Eng. Design, Glasgow, UK, pp. 1-10.