The path to licensure for academic psychologists: How tough is the road?

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 567-586

  DiLillo, David ^a,c   DeGue, Sarah ^a   Cohen, Lee M ^b   Morgan, Robert D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Texas Tech University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Academic psychologist; Professional licensure; Psychology licensing board; Rules and regulations

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749499152     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.567     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Academic Review. (2005). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved July 28, 2005, from http://www.areview.com/ProgramDesc.asp?Lic=PW&Key=f&tm=m
2. American Psychological Association. (1987). Model Act for State Licensure of Psychologists. American Psychologist, 42, 696-703.
3. American Psychological Association, Committee on Accreditation. (2005). Guidelines and Principles of Accreditation of Programs in Professional Psychology. Retrieved July 28, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/ed/G&P052.pdf
4. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2003). Guidelines for supervision of doctoral level candidates for licensure. Retrieved July 18, 2005, from http://www.asppb.org
5. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2006). Licensing boards contact information. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http/www.asppb.org/ about/boardContactStatic aspx
6. Cohen, L. M., Morgan, R. D., DiLillo, D., & Flores, L. Y. (2003). Why was my major professor so busy? Establishing an academic career while pursuing applied work. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 88-94.
7. Kentucky Administrative Regulations 201 § 26:190. (n. d.). Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://finance.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/D00A6938-E115-4FB1-A60E- 9FB730BA296C/0/lawandregulations.pdf.
8. Knapp, S., & Vandecreek, L. (1997). Ethical and legal aspects of clinical supervision. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 589-599). New York: Wiley.
9. Olvey, C. D., Hogg, A., & Counts, W. (2002). Licensure requirements: Have we raised the bar too far? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 323-329.
10. Psychologists Licensing Act, 59 Okla Stat § 1362.2 (1965 amended 2004). Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.ok.gov/OSBEP/documents/ Psych%20Lic%20Act%202004%20for%20mailing.pdf
11. Regulations Relating to the Practice of Psychology California 16 § 1387 2005. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.psychboard.ca.gov/laws_regs/ laws_regs.pdf
12. Ryan, A. M., & Chan, D. (1999). Perceptions of the EPPP: How do licensure candidates view the process? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 519-530.
13. Stewart, A. E., & Stewart, E. A. (1998). Trends in postdoctoral education: Requirements for licensure and training opportunities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 273-283.
14. University of Kentucky, College of Education. (2005). 50 states and U.S. territories licensure, regulations, associations and boards. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.uky.edu/Education/EDP/psyinfo2.html
15. Vacha-Haase, T., Davenport, D. S., & Kerewsky, S. D. (2004). Problematic students: Gatekeeping practices of academic professional psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 115-122.
16. Williams-Nickelson, C. (n.d.). Outcome of the Commission on Education and Training Leading to Licensure in Psychology: Impact and implications for students and new psychologists. Retrieved December 31, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/apags/edtrain/comontrain.html