Towards internationalizing the curriculum in a context of globalization: Comparing policy processes in two settings

Compare

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 443-461

  Vidovich, Lesley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Globalisation; Internationalisation; Market ideology; Non government schools; Policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749483591     PISSN: 03057925     EISSN: 14693623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305792042000294823     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adnett, N, and Davies, P. 2000. Competition and curriculum diversity in local schools markets: theory and evidence, Journal of Education Policy, 15(2): 157–168.
2. Barnes D, 1982 Practical Curriculum Study (London, Routledge and Keegan Paul)
3. Bird, E. 2001. Disciplining the interdisciplinary: Radicalism and the academic curriculum, British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 22(4): 463–478.
4. Giddens A, 1994 Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics (Cambridge, Polity Press)
5. Hargreaves, A, and Moore, S. 1999. Getting into outcomes: The emotions of interpretation and implementation, Curriculum Perspectives, 19(3): 1–9.
6. Henry M, Lingard Rizvi B, F., Taylor S, 2001 The OECD, Globalisation and Education Policy (Amsterdam, Pergamon)
7. Kam, H, and Gopinathan, S. 1999. Recent developments in education in Singapore, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(1): 99–117.
8. Kirk, D, and MacDonald, D. 2001. Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5): 551–567.
9. Macpherson, I. 2000. Investigating space for significant stakeholders in curriculum leadership: The beginnings of an ongoing conversation, Curriculum Perspectives, 20(1): 33–43.
10. Marginson, S. 1999. After globalisation: Emerging politics of education, Journal of Education Policy, 14(1): 19–31.
11. Moore, R, and Young, M. 2001. Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of education: towards a reconceptualisation, British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 22(4): 445–461.
12. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 1994 Education in a new international setting: Curriculum development for internationalisation—guidelines for country case study (Paris, OECD)
13. Penney, D. 1998. School subjects and structures: Reinforcing traditional voices in contemporary ‘reforms’ of education, Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 19(1): 5–17.
14. Robertson R, 1992 Globalisation (London, Sage)
15. Sachs, J. 2001. Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes, Journal of Education Policy, 16(2): 149–161.
16. Sharpe, L, and Gopinathan, S. 2002. After effectiveness: new directions in the Singaporean system?, Journal of Education Policy, 17(2): 151–166.
17. Stronach, I, Corbin, B, McNamara, O, Stark, S, and Warne, T. 2002. Towards and uncertain politics of professionalism: teacher and nurse identities in flux, Journal of Education Policy, 17(1): 109–138.
18. Taylor S, Rizvi F., Lingard B, Henry M, 1997 Education Policy and the Politics of Change (London, Routledge)
19. Townsend R, 1991 Curriculum policy management in: Lewy A, (Ed.) The International Encyclopaedia of Curriculum (Oxford, Pergamon Press) 117 118
20. Uhrmacher, P. 1993. Coming to know the world through Waldorf education, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(1): 87–104.
21. Vincent, C. 2001. Social class and parental agency, Journal of Education Policy, 16(4): 347–364.
22. Vincent, C, and Martin, J. 2000. schools based parents groups—a politics of voice and representation, Journal of Education Policy, 15(5): 459–480.
23. Walford G, 1989 Private Schools in Ten Countries: Policy and Practice (London, Routledge)
24. Webb, R, and Vulliamy, G. 1999. Managing curriculum policy changes: A comparative analysis of primary schools in England and Finland, Journal of Education Policy, 14(2): 117–137.
25. Yang, R. 2002. University internationalisation: its meanings, rationales and implications, Intercultural Education, 13(1): 81–95.