Laser stimulation of the auditory nerve

Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 745-753

  Izzo, Agnella D ^a   Richter, Claus Peter ^b,d   Jansen, E Duco ^c   Walsh Jr , Joseph T ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Neuroprosthesis; Optical stimulation; Spatial selectivity; Spiral ganglion cell

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GERBIL; HAIR CELL; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HOLMIUM LASER; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; GERBILLINAE; LASERS; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 33749483376     PISSN: 01968092     EISSN: 10969101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20358     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Galvani L. De viribus electricitatis in motu musculari commentarius. De Bononiensi Scientiarum et Artium Institute atque Academia Commentarii 1791;7:363-418.
2. Fourcin A, Rosen S, Moore B, Douek E, Clarke G, Dodson H, Bannister L. External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Clinical, psychophysical, speech-perceptual and histological findings. Br J Audiol 1979;13:85-107.
3. Duckert L, Miller J. Acute morphological changes in guinea pig cochlea following electrical stimulation. A preliminary scanning electron microscope study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:33-40.
4. Counter S. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: Effects and side-effects. Scand Audiol Supp 1993;37:1-32.
5. Agnew W, Yuen T, McCreery DB. Morphologic changes after prolonged electrical stimulation of the cat's cortex at defined charge densities. Exp Neurol 1983;79:387-411.
6. Shannon R. A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992;39:424-426.
7. Brummer S, Robblee L, Hambrecht F. Criteria for selecting electrodes for electrical stimulation: Theoretical and practical considerations. Ann NY Acad Sci 1983;405:159-171.
8. Jolly C, Spelman F, Clopton B. Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: Modeling and experimental data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996;43:857-865.
9. Matsushima J, Miyoshi S, Takeichi N, Uemi N, Sakajiri M, Ifukube T. A method to reduce the current spread in cochlear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1997;52:106-109.
10. Liang D, Lusted H, White R. The nerve-electrode interface of the cochlear implant: Current spread. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999;46:35-43.
11. Vanpoucke F, Zarowski A, Casselman J, Frijns J, Peeters S. The facial nerve canal: An important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:282-289.
12. Arvanitaki A, Chalazonitis N. Excitatiory and inhibitory processes initiated by light and infra-red radiations in single identifiable nerve cells. In: Florey E, editor. Nervous Inhibition. New York: Pergamon Press; 1961.
13. Fork RL. Laser stimulation of nerve cells in aplysia. Science 1971;171:907-908.
14. Wade PD, Taylor J, Siekevitz P. Mammalian cerebral cortical tissue responds to low-intensity visible light. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1988;85:9322-9326.
15. Hirase H, Nikolenko V, Goldberg JH, Yuste F. Multiphoton stimulation of neurons. J Neurobiol 2002;51:237-247.
16. Peticolas W, Goldsborough J, Reickhoff K. Double photon excitation in organic crystals. Phys Rev Lett 1963;10:43-45.
17. Denk W, Strickler J, Webb W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 1990;248:73-76.
18. Wells J, Kao C, Mariappan K, Albea J, Jansen ED, Konrad P, Mahadevan-Jansen A. Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. Optics Lett 2005;31:235-238.
19. Walsh JT, Cummings J. Effect of the dynamic optical properties of water on midinfrared laser ablation. Laser Surg Med 1994;15:295-305.
20. Niemz MH. Laser-tissue interactions: Fundamentals and applications, 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
21. Emadi G, Richter CP, Dallos P. Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: Radial and longitudinal variations. J Neurophysiol 2004;91:474-488.
22. Taylor M, Creelman C. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 1967;41:782-787.
23. Gummer A, Smolders J, Kline R. Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique. Hear Res 1987;29:63-92.
24. Xu S, Shepherd R, Chen Y, Clark G. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hear Res 1993;70:205-215.
25. Pfennigdorff T. Elektrisch evozierte Potentiale vom Hörnerv: Die Entwicklung einer präopertiven Methode für Cohlea-Implantationen. Frankfurt am Main: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität; 1993.
26. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR. The cochlea. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
27. Welch AJ, van Gemert MJC. Optical-thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue. New York: Plenum Press; 1995.