A multi-dimensional separation of concerns approach for model driven process framework modeling

Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1707-1716

  Duan, Yu Cong ^a,b   Gu, Yu Qing ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Model driven development; Multi dimensional separation of concerns; Process framework

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION; BEHAVIORISM; GENERALITY; MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; MULTI DIMENSIONAL; NONFUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; PROCESS FRAMEWORKS; SEPARATION OF CONCERNS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS CONTROL; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SEPARATION;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33749464079     PISSN: 10009825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/jos171707     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Miller J, Mukerji J. MDA Guide version 1.0.1. omg/2003-06-01, 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf
2. Unified modeling language: Superstructure, version 2.0. Revised Final Adopted Specification, ptc/04-05-02, 2004. http://www.omg.org/uml/
3. Jia Y. The evolutionary component-based software reuse approach [Ph.D. Thesis]. Beijing: Institute of Software, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2002 (in Chinese with English abstract).
4. Forbrig P, Laemmel R, Mannhaupt D. Pattern-Oriented development with rational rose. RationalEdge, 2001. http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/ RationalEdge/jan01/ PatternOrientedDevelopmentwithRationalRoseJan01.pdf
5. Pallos MS. Service-Oriented architecture (SOA): A primer. eAI Journal, 2001. http://www.eaijournal.com/PDF/SOAPallos.pdf
6. Zhang W, Mei H. A feature-oriented domain model and its modeling process. Journal of Software, 2003, 14 (8): 1345-1356 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.jos.org.cn/1000-9825/14/1345.htm
7. Kande M. A concern-oriented approach to software architecture [Ph.D. Thesis]. Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2003.
8. Wasserman AI. User software engineering and the design of interactive systems. In: Proc. of the 5th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering. Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1981. 387-393.
9. Rashid A, Moreira A, Araujo J. Modularisation and composition of aspectual requirements. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int'l Conf. on Aspect-Oriented Software Development. New York: ACM, 2003. 11-20.
10. Bresciani P, Perini A, Giorgini P, Giunchiglia F, Mylopoulos J. Tropos: An Agent-oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2004, 8 (3): 203-236.
11. VanHilst M, Notkin D. Decoupling change from design. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGSOFT'96 Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering. New York: ACM, 1996. 58-69.
12. Regnell B, Kimbler K, Wesslen A. Improving the use case driven approach to requirements engineering. In: Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Int'l Symp. Requirements Engineering. Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995. 40-47.
13. Tan WA, Zhou BS, Zhang L. Research on the flexible simulation technology for enterprise process model. Journal of Software, 2001, 12 (7): 1080-1087.
14. Heller M, Schleicher A, Westfechtel B. A management system for evolving development processes. In: Integrated Design and Process Technology, IDPT 2003. Austin: Society for Design and Process Science 2003. http://www-i3.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/ private/bernhard/idpt03b.pdf
15. Clarke S, Walker RJ. Composition patterns: An approach to designing reusable aspects. In: Proc. of the 23rd Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE). Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001. 5-14. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/labs/spl/papers/2001/icse01-cp.pdf
16. Egyed A. Heterogeneous views integration and its automation [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of Southern California, 2000.
17. Sage AP, Lynch CL. Systems integration and architecting: An overview of principles, practices, and perspectives, systems engineering. The Journal of the Int'l Council on Systems Engineering, 1998, 1 (3): 176-226.
18. Hausmann JH, Heckel R, Taentzer G. Detection of conflicting functional requirements in a use case-driven approach. In: Proc. of the ICSE 2002. Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002. 105-115.
19. Kandé MM, Strohmeier A. On the role of multi-dimensional separation of concerns in software architecture. In: Proc. of the OOPSLA 2000 Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns in Object-Oriented Systems. 2000. 1-6. http://trese.cs.utwente.nl/workshops/OOPSLA2000/papers/kande.pdf
20. Tarr P, Ossher H, Harrison W, Sutton SM. N degrees of separation: Multi-Dimensional separation of concerns. In: Proc. of the '99 Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering. Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999. 107-119.
21. IEEE Architecture Working Group. Recommended practice for architectural description. IEEE P1471/D5.2 Information Technology Draft, 1999.
22. Hilliard R. Aspects, concerns, subjects, views. In: Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns in Object-oriented Systems (at OOPSLA'99). 1999. 1-4. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/-murphy/multid-workshop-oopsla99/ position-papers/ws08-hilliard.pdf
23. Jr Sutton SM, Rouvellou I. Issues in the design and implementation of a concern-space modeling schema. 2001. http://www.research.ibm.com/hyperspace/workshops/ icse2001/Papers/sutton.pdf
24. Plasil F, Mencl V. Getting Whole Picture behavior in a use case model. Trans. of the SDPS: Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 2003, 7 (4): 63-79.
25. Giese H. Separation of concerns and roles in the object coordination nets approach. 2001. 1-6. http://www.info.uni-karlsruhe.de/-pulvermu/workshops/aop2001/ beitraege/giese.pdf.
26. Shi ZZ, Shi J. Perspectives on cognitive informatics. In: Patel D, Patel S, Wang YX, eds. Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Int'l Conf. on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI 2003). London: IEEE Computer Society, 2003. 129-136.
27. Herrmann S. Views and concerns and interrelationships-Lessons learned from developing the multi-view software engineering environment PIROL [Ph.D. Thesis]. Berlin: Technical University, 2002.
28. Yoon IC, Min SY, Bae DH. Tailoring and verifying software process. In: Proc. of APSEC 2001. Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001. 202-210.
29. Tekinerdogan B. Synthesis based software architecture design [Ph.D. Thesis]. Enschede: University of Twente, 2000.
30. Frank W, Tyson KP. Be clear, clean, concise. Communications of the ACM, 2002, 45 (11): 79-81.
31. Jin Z, Lu R, Bell DA. Automatically multi-paradigm requirements modeling and analyzing: An ontology-based approach. Science in China (Series F), 2003, 46 (4): 279-297.
32. Wang Q, Li MS. Software process management: Practices in China. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3840: 317-331.
33. Duan YC, Cheung SC, Fu XL, Gu YQ. A metamodel based model transformation approach. In: Proc. of 3rd ACIS Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA 2005). Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005. 184-191.