Dual response optimization: The desirability approach

International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory Applications and Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 335-342

  Köksoy, Onur ^a  

^a NIGDE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Desirability function approach; Dual response optimization; Quality improvement; Robust parameter design

Indexed keywords

FUNCTION EVALUATION; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

DESIRABILITY FUNCTION APPROACH; DUAL RESPONSE OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; ROBUST PARAMETER DESIGNS;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 33749457664     PISSN: 10724761     EISSN: 1943670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Box, G.E.P., and Draper, N.R. (1987). Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2. Copeland, K.A.F., and Nelson, P.R. (1996). Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 28: 331-336.
3. Del Castillo, E., and Montgomery, D.C. (1993). A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem. Journal of Quality Technology. 25: 199-204.
4. Del Castillo, E., Montgomery, D.C., and McCarville, D.R. (1996). Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization. Journal of Quality Technology. 28: 337-345.
5. Derringer, G., and Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12: 214-219.
6. Harrington, E.C. (1965). The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control, 21; 494-498.
7. Kackar, R. (1985). Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Methods. Journal of Quality Technology. 17: 176-188.
8. Kim, K., and Lin, D.K. (1998). Dual Response Surface Optimization: A Fuzzy Modeling Approach. Journal of Quality Technology. 30: 1-10.
9. Kim, Y.J., and Cho, B.R. (2002). Development of Priority-Based Robust Design. Quality Engineering. 14: 355-363.
10. Köksoy, O., and Doganaksoy, N. (2003). Joint Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation Using Response Surface Methods. Journal of Quality Technology. 35: 239-252.
11. Lin, D.K.J., and Tu, W. (1995). Dual Response Surface Optimization. Journal of Quality Technology. 27: 34-39.
12. Myers, R.H., Khuri, A.I., and Vining, G.G. (1992). Response Surface Alternatives to the Taguchi Robust Parameter Design Approach. The American Statistician. 46: 131-139.
13. Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes. Kraus Inter. Publications, White Plains, NY.
14. Taguchi, G., and Wu, Y. (1985). Introduction to Off-Line Quality Control, Central Japan Quality Control Association, Nagaya, Japan.
15. Tong, L., and Su, C. (1997). Optimizing Multi-Response Problems in the Taguchi Method by Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 13: 25-34.
16. Vining, G.G., and Myers, R. H. (1990). Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 22: 38-45.