Assessing the environmental risks of transgenic volunteer weeds

Crop Ferality and Volunteerism

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 389-402

  Raybould, Alan ^a  

^a JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749456401     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420037999     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service). 1987. 7 CFR Parts 330 and 340, Plant pests; introduction of genetically engineered organisms or products; final rule. Fed. Regist. 52:22892-22915.
2. Bergelson J. 1994. Failing to predict invasiveness from changes in fecundity: a model study of transgenic plants. Ecology 75:49-252.
3. Bowerman P. 1993. Effects of cultivations on volunteer oilseed rape. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:163-166.
4. Bullock JM. 1999. Using matrix models to target GMO risk assessment. Asp. Appl. Biol. 53:205-212.
5. Candolfi MP, Barrett KL, Campbell PJ, Forster R, Grandy N, Huet M-C, Lewis G, Oomen PA, Schmuck R, Vogt H. 2001. Guidance document on regulatory testing and risk assessment procedures for plant protection products with non-target arthropods. Pensacola, FL: SETAC Press. 48 pp.
6. Colbach N, Clermont-Dauphin C., Meynard JM. 2001. GENESYS: a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers I. Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 83:235-253.
7. Cross FB. 1996. Paradoxical perils of the precautionary principle. Washington Lee Law Rev. 53:851-925.
8. de Vries FT, van der Meijden R, Brandenburg WA. 1992. Botanical files: a study of the real chances of gene flow from cultivated plants to the wild flora of the Netherlands. Gorteria, Suppl. 1:1-100.
9. Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F. 2003. Assessing the risks of insect resistant transgenic plants on entomophagous arthropods: Bt-maize expressing CCry1Ab as a case study. BioControl 48:611-636.
10. Ervin DE, Welsh R, Batie SS, Line Carpentier C. 2003. Towards an ecological systems approach in public research for environmental regulation of transgenic crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 99:1-14.
11. Garstang J. 1993. The effects of volunteers on cereal quality and profitability. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:67-74.
12. Hall L, Topinka K, Huffman J, Davis L, Good A. 2000. Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant BBrassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48:688-694.
13. Heard MS, Hawes C, Champion GT, Clark SJ, Firbank LG, Haughton AJ, Parish AM, Perry JN, Rothery P, Scott RJ, Skellern MP, Squire GR, Hill MO. 2003. Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358:1819-1832.
14. Hill RA, Sendashonga C. 2003. General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms:lessons from chemical risk assessment. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2:81-88.
15. Kareiva P. 1996. Developing a predictive ecology for non-indigenous species and ecological invasions. Ecology 77:1651-1652.
16. Kareiva P, Parker IM, Pascual M. 1996. Can we use experiments and models in predicting the invasiveness of genetically engineered organisms? Ecology 77:1670-1675.
17. Keeler KH. 1989. Can genetically engineered crops become weeds? Bio/Technology 7:1134-1139.
18. Kling J. 1996. Could transgenic supercrops one day breed superweeds? Science 274:180-181.
19. Knott CM. 1993. Volunteer linseed control in vining peas. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:179-184.
20. McCammon SL. 1998. AgrEvo USA Company Petition 98-329-01p. Determination of nonregulated status for glufosinate tolerant rice transformation events LLRICE06 and LLRICE62. Finding of no significant impact. http://www.essentialbiosafety.info/docroot/decdocs/01-290-077.pdf.
21. Miller HI. 2003. Will we reap what biopharming sows? Nature Biotechnol. 21:480-481.
22. National Research Council. 2002. Environmental effects of transgenic plants: the scope and adequacy of regulation. Washington, D.C.: National Acad. Press. 320 pp.
23. Orson J. 1993. The penalties of volunteer crops. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:1-8.
24. Oster GF. 1981. Predicting populations. Am. Zool. 21:831-844.
25. Peters RH. 1991. A critique for ecology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 366 pp.
26. Popper KR. The Logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge. 480 pp.
27. Poppy GM 2000. GM crops: environmental risks and non-target effects. Trends Plant Sci. 5:4-6.
28. Raybould AF, Gray AJ. 1993. Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 30:199-219.
29. Runham SR, Davies JS, Leatherhead MJ. 1993. Weed control strategies for volunteer potatoes in onions. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:113-122.
30. Scheffler JA, Dale PJ. 1994. Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species. Transgenic Res. 3:263-278.
31. Wilkinson MJ, Elliott LJ, Alainguillaume J, Shaw MW, Norris C, et al. 2003. Hybridization between BBrassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom. Science 302:457-459.
32. Wilkinson MJ, Sweet J, Poppy GM. 2003. Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding gridlock? Trends Plant Sci. 8:208-212.
33. White JL. 2002. US regulatory oversight for safe development and commercialization of plant biotechnology. In Ecological and agronomic consequences of gene flow from transgenic crops to wild relatives. Snow A, Mallory-Smith C, Ellstrand N, Holt J, Quemada H, Eds., Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. http://www.biosci.ohio-state.edu/asnowlab/Proceedings.pdf.
34. Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR. 2001. The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 292:637-638.
35. Yarham DJ, Gladders P. 1993. Effects of volunteer plants on crop diseases. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35:75-82.