Continuum-based design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear shell structures using meshfree method

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 231-266

  Yi, Kiyoung ^a   Choi, K K ^a   Kim, Nam H ^b   Botkin, Mark E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c Vehicle Development Research Lab   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuum based design sensitivity analysis; Design optimization; Elastoplasticity; Finite deformation; Meshfree method; Nonlinear shell structure

Indexed keywords

CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DEFORMATION; ELASTOPLASTICITY; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

FINITE DEFORMATION SHELL ANALYSIS; MESHFREE METHOD; ZERO-NORMAL STRESS CONDITION;

SHELLS (STRUCTURES);

CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DEFORMATION; ELASTOPLASTICITY; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHELLS (STRUCTURES); STRESS ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 33749450925     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1710     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Botkin ME. Shape optimization of plate and shell structures. AIAA Journal 1982; 20:268-273.
2. Zyczkowski M. Recent advances in optimal structural design of shells. European Journal of Mechanics and Solids 1992; 11:5-24.
3. Yamazaki K, Vandeplaats GN. Design sensitivity analysis with isoparametric shell elements. Structural Optimization 1993; 5:152-158.
4. Gates AA, Accorsi ML. Automatic shape optimization of three-dimensional shell structures with large shape change. Computers and Structures 1993; 49:167-178.
5. Chenis D. Discrete gradient and discretized continuum gradient methods for shape optimization of shells. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 1994; 22:73-115.
6. Csonka B, Kozak I, Mota Soares CM, Mota Soares CA. Shape optimization of axisymmetric shells using a higher-order shear deformation theory. Structural Optimization 1995; 9:117-127.
7. Linby T, Santos JLT. Shape optimization of three-dimensional shell structures with the shape parameterization of a CAD System. Structural Optimization 1999; 18:126-133.
8. Moita JS, Barbosa JI, Mota Soares CM, Mota Soares CA. Sensitivity analysis and optimal design of geometrically non-linear laminated plates and shells. Computers and Structures 2000; 76:407-420.
9. Choi B, Park YH, Choi KK. Shape design optimization of joining mechanism using doubly curved shell. Computer and Structures 2000; 77:495-507.
10. Oral S. A Mindlin plate finite element with semi-analytical shape design sensitivities. Computers and Structures 2000; 78:467-472.
11. Lee SJ, Hinton E. Dangers inherited in shells optimized with linear assumptions. Computers and Structures 2000; 78:473-486.
12. Kim NH, Choi KK, Chen JS, Botkin ME. Meshfree analysis and design sensitivity analysis for shell structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 53:2087-2116.
13. Simo JC, Taylor RL. A return mapping algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1986; 22:649-670.
14. Simo JC, Kennedy JG. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. part v: nonlinear plasticity: formulation and integration algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 96: 133-191.
15. Hughes TJR, Winget J. Finite rotation effects in numerical integration of rate constitutive equations arising in large deformation analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1980; 15:1862-1867.
16. Hughes TJR. In Numerical Implementation of Constitutive Models: Rate-Independent deviatoric Plasticity, Theoretical Foundation for Large-scale Computations of Nonlinear Material Behavior, Nemat-Nasser S, Asaro RJ, Hegemier GA (eds). Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht, 1984.
17. Fish J, Shek K. Computational aspect of incrementally objective algorithms for large deformation plasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 44:839-851.
18. MSC/PATRAN User's Guide. The MacNeal-Schwendler Corp.: 1999.
19. Chang KH, Choi KK, Tsai CS, Chen CJ, Choi BS, Yu X. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization tool (DSO) for shape design applications. Computing Systems in Engineering 1995; 6:151-175.
20. Bonet J, Wood RD. Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1997.
21. Liu WK, Jun S, Li S, Adee J, Belytschko T. Reproducing kernel particle method for structural dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1995; 38:1655-1679.
22. Chen JS, Pan C, Wu CT, Liu WK. Reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation analysis of nonlinear structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 139:195-227.
23. Chen JS, Pan C, Roque CMOL, Wang HP. Lagrangian reproducing kernel particle method for metal forming analysis. Computational Mechanics 1998; 22:289-307.
24. Chen JS, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y. Stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin meshfree methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 5:435-466.
25. Chen JS, Wang HP. New boundary condition treatments for meshless computation of contact problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 187:441-468.
26. Simo JC, Fox MS, Rifai MS. On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part iii: computational aspects of the nonlinear theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1990; 79:21-70.
27. Liu WK, Guo Y, Tang S, Belytschko T. A multiple-quadrature eight-node hexahedral finite element for large deformation elastoplastic analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 154:69-132.