Informed consent for facial transplantation

Transplant International

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 861-867

  Renshaw, Anthony ^a   Clarke, Alex ^a   Diver, Andrew J ^a   Ashcroft, Richard E ^b   Butler, Peter E M ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Facial transplantation; Informed consent; Screening

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CULTURAL FACTOR; FACE TRANSPLANTATION; GOLD STANDARD; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSONALITY TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK; TRANSPLANTATION;

CONSENT FORMS; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FACE; FACIAL INJURIES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL COMPETENCY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RISK;

EID: 33749432254     PISSN: 09340874     EISSN: 14322277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00358.x     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Butler PE, Clarke A, Hettiaratchy S. Facial transplantation. BMJ 2005; 331: 1349.
2. Morris PJ, Bradley JA, Doyal L, et al. Facial transplantation: a working party report from the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Transplantation 2004; 77: 330.
3. The Lancet. The first facial transplant. Lancet 2005; 366: 1984.
4. Agich GJ, Siemionow M. Facing the ethical questions in facial transplantation. Am J Bioeth 2004; 4: 25.
5. Goering S. Facing the consequences of facial transplantation: individual choices, social effects. Am J Bioeth 2004; 4: 37.
6. Gattellari M, Voigt KJ, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 503.
7. Department of Health. Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. London: Department of Health Publications, 2005 (17 March).
8. del Carmen MG, Joffe S. Informed consent for medical treatment and research: a review. Oncologist 2005; 10: 636.
9. Pleat JM, Dunkin CS, Tyler MP. Communication of risk in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 2104.
10. Tiller K, Meiser B, Gould L, et al. Knowledge of risk management strategies, and information and risk management preferences of women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Psychooncology 2005; 14: 249.
11. Tobias JS, Souhami RL. Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel. BMJ 1993; 307: 1199.
12. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984; 252: 2990.
13. Timmermans D, Molewijk B, Stiggelbout A, Kievit J. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54: 255.
14. Flesch R. The Art of Readable Writing. New York, USA: Harper and Row, 1974.
15. Fry E. A readability formula that saves time. J Read 1968; 11: 265.
16. Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Vitale G, et al. Human hand transplantation: what have we learned? Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 664.
17. Banis J, Barker J, Cunningham M, et al. Response to selected commentaries on the AJOB Target Article 'On the ethics of facial transplantation research'. Am J Bioeth 2004; 4: W23.
18. Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Margreiter R, et al. The International Registry on hand and composite tissue transplantation. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1210.
19. Andrew Lee WP, Nguyen VT. Perspectives on hand transplantation. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32: 463.
20. Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM. A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. CMAJ 1997; 157: 383.
21. Mazur DJ, Hickam DH. Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 114.
22. Doherty C, Doherty W. Patients' preferences for involvement in clinical decision-making within secondary care and the factors that influence their preferences. J Nurs Manag 2005; 13: 119.
23. Mansell D, Poses RM, Kazis L, Duefield CA. Clinical factors that influence patients' desire for participation in decisions about illness. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2991.
24. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001; 4: 99.
25. Clarke A, Butler PE. Face transplantation: psychological assessment and preparation for surgery. Psych Health Med 2004; 9: 315.
26. Michie S, Lester K, Pinto J, Marteau TM. Communicating risk information in genetic counseling: an observational study. Health Educ Behav 2005; 32: 589.
27. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1689.
28. Schaeffer MH, Krantz DS, Wichman A, Masur H, Reed E, Vinicky JK. The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research. Am J Med 1996; 100: 261.
29. Godwin Y. Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 121.
30. DeRenzo EG, Conley RR, Love R. Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation: state-of-the-art and beyond. J Health Care Law Policy 1998; 1: 66.
31. Stanley BM, Walters DJ, Maddern GJ. Informed consent: how much information is enough? Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68: 788.
32. Conboy-Hill S. The Cognitive Interview: a multipurpose approach to interviewing people with learning disabilities. Clin Psychol 2001; 2: 17.
33. Macklin R. Understanding informed consent. Acta Oncol 1999; 38: 83.
34. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1635.
35. American Psychiatric Association. Guidelines for assessing the decision-making capacities of potential research subjects with cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1649.
36. Weinstein ND, Marcus SE, Moser RP. Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tob Control 2005; 14: 55.
37. Onarheim H, Vindenes HA. High risk for accidental death in previously burn-injured adults. Burns 2005; 31: 297.
38. Thaler RH, Johnson E. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Manage Sci 1990; 36: 643.
39. Kahneman D, Tversky A. The psychology of preferences. Sci Am 1982; 246: 166.
40. Edgell SE, McCabe SJ, Breidenbach WC, Neace WP, LaJoie AS, Abell TD. Different reference frames can lead to different hand transplantation decisions by patients and physicians. J Hand Surg [Am] 2001; 26: 196.
41. Brouha P, Naidu D, Cunningham M, et al. Risk acceptance in composite-tissue allotransplantation reconstructive procedures. Microsurgery 2006; 26: 144.
42. Clarke A, Butler PE. Facial transplantation: adding to the reconstructive options after severe facial injury and disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2005; 5: 1539.
43. Putzke J, Williams M, Millsaps R. The impact of a defensive response set on the relationship between MMPI and cognitive tests among heart transplant candidates. Assessment 1997; 4: 365.
44. Ruchinskas RA, Crews WD, Barth JT, Francis JP, Robbins MK, Kroshek DK. A neuropsychological normative database for lung transplant candidates. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2000; 7: 107.
45. Rosenberger J, Geckova AM, van Dijk JP, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of noncompliant behaviour and its risk factors in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2005; 18: 1072.
46. Stilley CS, Dew MA, Pilkonis P, et al. Personality characteristics among cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2005; 27: 113.
47. Carta I, Convertino O, Cornaggia CM. Psychological investigation protocol of candidates for hand transplantation. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 621.
48. Weinstein ND. Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychol 1984; 3: 431.