Two approaches to valuing some of bicycle facilities' presumed benefits

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 309-320

  Krizek, Kevin J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^b Active Communities/Transportation (ACT) Research Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; PARKING; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL TIME;

MINNEAPOLIS; MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; SAINT PAUL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33749427396     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360608976753     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abraham, J., McMillan, S., Brownlee, A., & Hunt, J. D. (2002, January). Investigation of cycling sensitivities. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
2. Anderson, S. T., & West, S. E. (in press). Open space, residential properry values, and spatial context, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
3. Aultman-Hall, L., Hall, F., & Baetz, B. (1997). Analysis of bicycle commuter routes using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for bicycle planning. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 102-110.
4. Bach, A. & Singer, N. (2003, November 1). Lake Sammamish rails-to-trails vision: One person's dream, another's nightmare. Seattle Times, p. 1A.
5. Barnes, G., & Krizek, K. J. (2005). Estimating bicycling demand. Transportation Research Record 1939, 45-51.
6. Benson, E. D., Hansen, J. L., Schwartz, A. L. J., & Smersh, G. T. (1998). Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(1), 55-73.
7. Bovy, P., & Bradley, M. (1985). Route choice analyzed with stated-preference approaches. Transportation Research Record, 1037, 11-20.
8. Brasington, D. M. (1999). Which measures of school quality does the housing market value? Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(3), 395-413.
9. Brookshire, D., Thayer, M., Schulze, W., & D'Arge, R. (1982). Valuing public goods: A comparison of survey and hedonic approaches. American Economic Review, 72(1), 165-177.
10. Crompton, J. L. (2001). Perceptions of how the presence of greenway trails affects the value of proximate properties. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(3), 114-132.
11. Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45-64.
12. Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: If you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record 1828, 116-123.
13. Franklin, J. P., & Waddell, P. (2003, January). A hedonic regression of home prices in King County, Washington, using activity-specific accessibility measures. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
14. Freeman, M. (1979). Hedonic prices, property values and measuring environmental benefits: A survey of the issue. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 10, 154-173.
15. Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 91-98.
16. Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1998). Bicycling in the United States: A fringe mode? Transportation Quarterly, 52(1), 9-11.
17. Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19-43.
18. Hopkinson, P., & Wardman, M. (1996). Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2(4), 241-249.
19. Irwin, E. G. (2002). The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics, 78(4), 465-480.
20. Kocian, L. (2004, August 26). Friends, foes of Nobscot rail trail take up sides. Boston Globe, p. 9.
21. Krizek, K. J. (in press). Estimating the economic benefits of bicycling and bicycle facilities: An interpretive review and proposed methods. In V. Inglada (Ed), Essays on transportation economics. New York: Springer.
22. Krizek, K. J., Barnes, G., Poindexter, G., Mogush, P. Thompson, K., Levinson, D., et al. (2006) Guidelines for analysis of investments in bicycle facilities.(NCHRP Report No. 552). Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
23. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.
24. Lenhart, J. (2001, June 10). Trail's appeal is lost on some; Neighbors: Not in our back yards. Washington Post, Loudoun Extra, p. 5.
25. Lindsey, G., Man, J., Payton, S., & Dickson, K. (2003, January). Amenity and recreation values of urban greenways. Paper presented at the Association of European Schools of Planning Congress, Leuven, Belgium.
26. Lindsey, G., Man, J., Payton, S., & Dickson, K. (2004). Property values, recreation values, and urban greenways. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 22(3), 69-90.
27. Lutzenhiser, M., & Netusil, N. R. (2001). The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3), 291-298.
28. Mahan, B. L., Polasky, S., & Adams, R. M. (2000). Valuing urban wetlands: A property price approach. Land Economics, 76(1), 100-113.
29. Michaels, R. G., & Smith, V. K. (1990). Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: The case of hazardous waste sites. Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 223-242.
30. Quang Do, A., & Grudnitski, G. (1995). Golf courses and residential house prices: An empirical examination. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10, 261-270
31. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.
32. Shafizadeh, K., & Niemeier, D. (1997). Bicycle journey-to-work: Travel behavior characteristics and spatial attributes. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 84-90.
33. Sirmans, G. S., & Macpherson, D. A. (2003, December). The composition of hedonic pricing models: A review of the literature. Available on-line at http://www.realtor.org/ncrer.nsf/pages/HomeValues? opendocument
34. Smith, V. K., Paulos, C., & Kim, H. (2002). Treating open space as an urban amenity. Resource and Energy Economics, 24, 107-129.
35. Stinson, A. S., & Bhat, C. R. (2003). An analysis of commuter bicyclist route choice using a stated-preference survey. Transportation Research Record 1828, 107-115.
36. Taylor, D., & Mahmassani, H. (1996). Analysis of stated-preference for intermodal bicycle-transit interfaces. Transportation Research Record 1556,86-95.
37. Tilahun, N. (2005). Trails, lanes or traffic: The value of different bicycle facilities using adaptive stated-preference survey. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Minnesota, Department of Civil Engineering.
38. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics (n.d.) 2001 Nationwide Household Transportation Survey. [Data file.] Available at http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/index.shtml.
39. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2003). NHTS 2001 Highlights Report (BTS Report No. BTS03-05). Washington, DC.