National wildlife federation EPA's mercury rule: The latest delay tactic

EM: Air and Waste Management Association's Magazine for Environmental Managers

Volumn , Issue AUG, 2005, Pages 14-15

  Stadler, Felice ^a  

^a National Wildlife Federation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749411101     PISSN: 10889981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. Final Rule, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 15, 2005; p 43. Available at www.epa.gov/mercury.
2. Regulatory Impart Analysis, Tables 7-9; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2005; p 7-8; 7-5.
3. Mercury Emissions from Electric Power Plants: An Analysis of EPA's Cap-and-Trade Regulations; CRS Report for Congress; Congressional Research Service (CRS), April 15, 2005; p 7.
4. Response to Petition for the Development of Regulations to Control Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Utility Boilers, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 2005. State law requires the agency to submit to the Environmental Board a proposed rule within six months of issuing its response.
5. Advances in Mercury Control Technology to Meet future Needs; Congressional Briefing, January 31, 2005; Institute of Clear Air Companies, 2005.
6. Integrating Atmospheric Mercury Deposition with Aquatic Cycling in South Florida; Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2003. Available at www.floridadep.org/labs/mercury/ docs/flmercury.htm.
7. Hrabik, T.R.; Watras, C.J. Recent Declines in Mercury Concentration in a Freshwater Fishery; Isolation the Effects of De-Acidification and Decreased Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Little Rock Lake; The Science of the Total Environment 2002, 297, 229-237.
8. Evers, D.; Burgess, N.; Champoux, L.; Hoskins, B.; Major, A.; Goodnle, W.; Taylor, R.; Poppenga, R.; Daigle, T. Patterns and Interpretation of Mercury-Exposure in Freshwater Avian Communities in Northeastern North America; Ecotoxicology 2005, 14, 193-221.
9. Mercury Study Report to Congress, Vol. 3: Fate and Transport of Mercury in the Environment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997; p 5-1.
10. Electric Power Research Institute. Overview of Mercury Emissions and Their Fate in the Environment. Presented at the Air & Waste Management Association's Annual Conference & Exhibition, June 2003.
11. Cohen, M. Source Attribution for Atmospheric Mercury Deposition: Where Does the Mercury in Mercury Deposition Come From? Presented to the Mercury Working Group, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, April 21, 2005.
12. Cohen, M. Modeling the Fate and Transport of Atmospheric Mercury in the Chesapeake Bay Region. Presented to the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, May 17, 2004.
13. Keeler, G.; Gratz, L.; Al-wali, K. Long-Term Atmospheric Mercury Wet Deposition at Underhill, Vermont; Ecotoxicology 2005, 14, 71-83.
14. Economic Valuation of Human Health Benefits of Controlling Mercury Emissions from U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), February 2003.
15. Trasande, L.; Landrigan P.; Schechter, C. Public Health and Economic Consequences of Methyl Mercury Toxicity to the Developing Brain," Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 590-596.
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.