A vector space model for semantic similarity calculation and OWL Ontology Alignment

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4080 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 307-316

  Tous, Rubén ^a   Delgado, Jaime ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; VECTOR QUANTIZATION;

GRAPH MATCHING ALGORITHMS; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT EVALUATION; OWL ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33749407703     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11827405_30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. M. Bisson. Learning in fol with a similarity measure. In Proceedings of the 10th American Association for Artificial Intelligence conference, San-Jose (CA US), pages 8287, 1992.
2. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web, 2002. citeseer.ist.psu.edu/doan02learning.html.
3. M. Ehrig and J. Euzenat. Relaxed precision and recall for ontology matching. http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/intont2005/intontproceedings.pdf.
4. M. Ehrig and S. Staab. Qom - quick ontology mapping, citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ 727796.html.
5. Vincent D. Blondel et al. A measure of similarity between graph vertices: Applications to synonym extraction and web searching. SIAM Rev., 46(4):647-666, 2004.
6. Wei Hu et al. Gmo: A graph matching for ontologies. In Integrating Ontologies, 2005.
7. J. Euzenat and P. Valtchev. Similarity-based ontology alignment in owl-lite. In Proc. of ECAI 2004, pages 333-337, Valencia, Spain, August 2004, 2004.
8. 5/2) algorithm for maximum matching in bipartite graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 4:225-231, 1973.
9. C. Leacock and M. Chodorow. Combining local context and wordnet similarity for word sense identification. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, 49(2):265-283, 1998.
10. J. H. Lee, M. H. Kim, and Y. J. Lee. Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in is-a hierarchies. Journal of Documentation, 49(2):188-207, 1993.
11. Ontology alignment evaluation initiative. 2005. http://oaei.inrialpes.fr/2005/.
12. Owl web ontology language overview. w3c recommendation 10 february 2004. See http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
13. C. H. Papadimitriou and K. Steiglitz. Combinatorial optimization: algorithms and complexity. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1982.
14. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal: Very Large Data Bases, 10(4):334-350, 2001. citeseer.ist.psu.edu/rahm01survey.html.
15. Resource description framework. See http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
16. G. Salton. The smart retrieval system. Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, 1971.
17. Z. Wu and M. Palmer. Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 133-138, Morristown, NJ, USA, 1994. Association for Computational Linguistics.