Probation officers' views on supervising women probationers

Women and Criminal Justice

Volumn 16, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 65-85

  Seng, Magnus ^a   Lurigio, Arthur J ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749403127     PISSN: 08974454     EISSN: 15410323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J012v16n01_03     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Austin, J.B., Bloom, B., & Donahue, T. (1992). Female offenders in the community: An analysis of innovative strategies and programs. San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
2. Beck. A.J., & Harrison, P.M. (2001). Prisoners in 2000. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
3. Chesney-Lind, M. (2000). Successful gender-responsive programming must reflect women's lives and needs. Women, girls, and criminal justice, Volume 1, Number 1. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
4. Erez, E. (1989). Gender, rehabilitation, and probation decisions. Criminology, 27, 307-327.
5. Festervan, E. (2003). Women probationers: Supervision and success. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
6. Glaser, D. (1964). The effectiveness of prison and parole systems. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
7. Glaze, L.E. (2002). Probation and parole in the United States, 2001. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
8. Glaze, L.E. (2003). Probation and parole in the United States, 2002. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
9. Greer, K. (2000). The changing nature of interpersonal relationships in a women's prison. Prison Journal, 80, 442-468.
10. Harrison, P.M., & Beck, A.J. (2002). Prisoners in 2001. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
11. Harrison, P.M., & Beck, A.J. (2003). Prisoners in 2002. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
12. Hobson, S.K. (1998). Making referrals: There is more to it than you think. Pediatric Nursing, 24, 63-71.
13. Keve, P.W. (1979). No farewell to arms. Crime and Delinquency, 25, 11-23.
14. Klosak, J.M. (1999). The course of their lives: Female offenders on probation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
15. Laningham, D., Taber, M., & Dinitz, R. (1966). How probation officers view their job responsibilities. Crime and Delinquency, 12, 118-127.
16. Mandell, B.R., & Schram, B. (2003). Introduction to human services policy and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Mangione, T.W. (1995). Mail surveys: Improving the quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Invisible punishments: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: The Free Press.
19. Maxfield, M.G., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20. Motiuk, L., & Blanchette, K. (1998). Assessing female offenders: What works? International Community Corrections Journal, 10, 6-9.
21. Norland, S., & Mann, P.J. (1984). Being troublesome: Women on probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 11, 17-28.
22. Ohlin, L., Piven, H., & Pappenfort, D. (1956). Major dilemmas of the social worker in probation and parole. Nation Probation and Parole Association Journal, 2, 46-53.
23. Oregon Policy Group (1995). Intermediate sanctions for women offenders: Oregon Intermediate Sanctions for Female Offenders Policy Group. Salem, OR: Author.
24. Pollock, J.M. (2002). Women, prison, and crime. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25. Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Sharp, S. (2003). The incarcerated woman. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Sigler, R.T. (1988). Role conflict for adult probation and parole officers: Fact or myth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 133-146.
28. Stinchcomb, J.B., & Fox, V.B. (1999). Introduction to corrections. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.