Explaining preferences with argument positions

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1560-1561

  Doutre, Sylvie ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a   Dunne, Paul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERIC FRAMEWORKS; REASONING PROCESS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33749398644     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-448, 2003.
2. C. Cayrol, S. Doutre, M.-Ch. Lagasquie-Shiex, and J. Mengin. "Minimal defence": a refinement of the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks. In Proc. NMR'2002, pages 408-415, 2002.
3. C. Cayrol, S. Doutre, and J. Mengin. On Decision Problems related to the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):377-403, 2003.
4. S. Doutre, T. J. M. Bench-Capon, and P. E. Dunne. On the development of argument positions. Technical Report ULCS-05-002, Univ. of Liverpool, 2005.
5. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
6. P. E. Dunne and T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency. Artif. Intell., 149:221-250, 2003.
7. J. R. Searle. Rationality in Action. MIT Press, 2001.