Quality and quantity of saliva DNA obtained from the self-administrated oragene method - A pilot study on the cohort of Swedish men

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1742-1745

  Rylander Rudqvist, Tove ^a   Håkansson, Niclas ^a   Tybring, Gunnel ^a   Wolk, Alicja ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGAROSE; DNA; PROTHROMBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA EXTRACTION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MALE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALIVA; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SWEDEN;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; DNA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC; SALIVA; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 33749368693     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0706     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. King IB, Satia-Abouta J, Thornquist MD, et al. Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1130-3.
2. Walker AH, Najarian D, White DL, Jaffe JF, Kanetsky PA, Rebbeck TR. Collection of genomic DNA by buccal swabs for polymerase chain reaction-based biomarker assays. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:517-20.
3. Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, et al. Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:687-96.
4. Feigelson HS, Rodriguez C, Robertson AS, et al. Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:1005-8.
5. Le Marchand L, Lum-Jones A, Saltzman B, Visaya V, Nomura AM, Kolonel LN. Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:701-3.
6. Freeman B, Powell J, Ball D, Hill L, Craig I, Plomin R. DNA by mail: an inexpensive and noninvasive method for collecting DNA samples from widely dispersed populations. Behav Genet 1997;27:251-7.
7. Meulenbelt I, Droog S, Trommelen GJ, Boomsma DI, Slagboom PE. High-yield noninvasive human genomic DNA isolation method for genetic studies in geographically dispersed families and populations. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:1252-4.
8. Lum A, Le Marchand L. A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:719-24.
9. Heath EM, Morken NW, Campbell KA, Tkach D, Boyd EA, Strom DA. Use of buccal cells collected in mouthwash as a source of DNA for clinical testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:127-33.
10. Mulot C, Stucker I, Clavel J, Beaune P, Loriot MA. Collection of human genomic DNA from buccal cells for genetics studies: comparison between cytobrush, mouthwash, and treated card. J Biomed Biotechnol 2005;2005:291-6.
11. London SJ, Xia J, Lehman TA, et al. Collection of buccal cell DNA in seventh-grade children using water and a toothbrush. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:1227-30.
12. Harty LC, Garcia-Closas M, Rothman N, Reid YA, Tucker MA, Hartge P. Collection of buccal cell DNA using treated cards. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:501-6.
13. Norman A, Bellocco R, Vaida F, Wolk A. Total physical activity in relation to age, body mass, health, and other factors in a cohort of Swedish men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:670-5.
14. Jurinke C, van den Boom D, Cantor CR, Koster H. Automated genotyping using the DNA MassArray technology. Methods Mol Biol 2002;187:179-92.
15. Phillips MS, Lawrence R, Sachidanandam R, et al. Chromosome-wide distribution of haplotype blocks and the role of recombination hot spots. Nat Genet 2003;33:382-7.
16. Holbrook JF, Stabley D, Sol-Church K. Exploring whole genome amplification as a DNA recovery tool for molecular genetic studies. J Biomol Tech 2005;16:125-33.
17. Steinberg K, Beck J, Nickerson D, et al. DNA banking for epidemiologic studies: a review of current practices. Epidemiology 2002;13:246-54.