Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources

Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 498-512

  Brophy, Jan ^a   Bawden, David ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Information retrieval; Search engines

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; LIBRARIES; PERSONNEL TRAINING; QUERY LANGUAGES; STUDENTS;

ACADEMIC LIBRARIES; GOOGLE;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 33749347088     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00012530510634235     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agusto, D.E. (2002), "Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's web-based decision-making", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 16-27.
2. Barry, C.L. and Schamber, L. (1998), "Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison", Information Processing and Management, Vol. 34 Nos 2/3, pp. 219-36.
3. Bawden, D. (1990), User-Oriented Evaluation of Information Systems and Services, Gower, Aldershot.
4. BBC (2003), "Google calls in the language police", BBC News, 20 June, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/3006486.stm (accessed 3 March 2005).
5. Bell, S. (2004), "The infodiet: how libraries can offer an appetizing alternative to Google", The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 50 No. 24, p. B15, available at: http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v50/i24/ 24b01501.htm (accessed 3 March 2005).
6. Bilal, D. (2001), "Children's use of the yahooligans web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviours on research tasks", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 118-36.
7. Borgman, C.L. (1996), "Why are online catalogs still hard to use?", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 493-503.
8. Brophy, J. (2004), "Is Google good enough? A study comparing a major search engine with academic library research", unpublished MSc dissertation, Department of Information Science, City University London, London, available at: www.city.ac.uk/library.
9. Chu, H. and Rosenthal, M. (1996), "Search engines for the world wide web: a comparative study and evaluation methodology", ASIS 1996 Annual Conference Proceedings, pp. 19-24.
10. Devine, J. and Egger-Sider, F. (2004), "Beyond Google: the invisible web in the academic library", Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 265-9.
11. Fast, K.V. and Campbell, D.G. (2004), "I still like Google: university student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web", Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, pp. 138-46.
12. Fialkoff, F. (2005), "Access by Google", Library Journal, 15 January, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA491137 (accessed 3 August 2005).
13. Greisdorf, H. (2003), "Relevance thresholds: a multi-stage predictive model of how users evaluate information", Information Processing and Management, Vol. 39, pp. 403-23.
14. Griffiths, J.R. and Brophy, P. (2005), "Student searching behaviour and the web: use of academic resources and Google", Library Trends, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 539-54.
15. Herring, M.Y. (2001), "10 reasons why the internet is no substitute for a library", American Libraries, April, pp. 76-8, available at: www.ala.org/ala/alonline/selectedarticles/10reasonswhy.htm (accessed 5 March 2005).
16. Lawrence, H. and Miller, W. (2000), Academic Research on the Internet: Options for Scholars and Libraries, Haworth Information Press, New York, NY.
17. Library Journal News (2003), "Google guy: reference librarians can keep jobs", Library Journal News, 13 May, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA2999471 (accessed 3 March 2005).
18. Mostafa, J. (2005), "Seeking better web searches", Scientific American, Vol. 292 No. 2, pp. 51-7.
19. Quint, B. (2002), "Searcher's voice: Google: (v)... ", The Searcher, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 6-9, available at: www.infotoday.com/searcher/ feb02/voice.htm (accessed 5 March 2005).
20. Robinson, L. (2000), "A strategic approach to research using internet tools and resources", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 11-19.
21. Robinson, L., McIlwaine, I., Copestake, P. and Anderson, C. (2000), "Comparative evaluation of the performance of online databases in answering toxicological queries", International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 79-87.
22. Saracevic, T. (1996), "Relevance reconsidered", in Ingewersen, P. and Pors, N.O. (Eds), Information Science: Integration in Perspectives, The Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, pp. 201-18, available at: www.scils.rutgers.edu/ ∼ tefko/CoLIS21996.doc (accessed 11 April 2005).
23. Schwartz, C. (1998), "Web search engines", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49 No. 11, pp. 973-82.
24. Sole, R.V. and Cancho, R.F. (2003), "Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), Vol. 100 No. 3, pp. 788-91, available at: www.pnas.org/cgi/ reprint/0335980100v1.pdf (accessed 5 March 2005).
25. Stoffle, C., Renaud, R. and Veldof, J. (1996), "Choosing our futures", College and Research Libraries, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 213-25.
26. Tennant, R. (2001), "Digital libraries - the convenience catastrophe", Library Journal, 15 December, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA185367 (accessed 14 May 2005).
27. Tenopir, C. (2004), "Is Google the competition", The Library Journal, 1 April, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA405423 (accessed 3 March 2005).
28. Tenopir, C. (2005), "Google in the academic library", The Library Journal, 1 February, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/ CA498868 (accessed 3 March 2005).
29. Xie, H. (Iris) (2004), "Online IR system evaluation: online databases versus web search engines", Online Information Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 211-9.