Sm/I2-mediated selective cleavage of the S-S or C-S bonds of sodium (Z)-allyl thiosulfates in aqueous media: Selective formation of di(Z-allyl) bisulfides or (2E)-methyl cinnamic esters

Synlett

Volumn , Issue 15, 2006, Pages 2492-2494

  Liu, Yunkui ^a   Zheng, Hui ^a   Xu, Danqian ^a   Xu, Zhenyuan ^a   Zhang, Yongmin ^b,c  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (China)

Author keywords

(2E) methyl cinnamic esters; Di(Z allyl) disulfides; Samarium metal; Selective cleavage; Sodium (Z) allyl thiosulfates

Indexed keywords

ALLYL COMPOUND; DISULFIDE; ESTER DERIVATIVE; IODINE; METHYL CINNAMIC ESTER DERIVATIVE; SAMARIUM; SODIUM ALLYL THIOSULFATE DERIVATIVE; THIOSULFATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 33749346507     PISSN: 09365214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-950406     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. (a) Lubineau, A.; Auge, J.; Queneau, Y. Synthesis 1994, 741.
2. (b) Li, C. J. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2023.
3. (c) Yamamoto, Y.; Asao, N. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2207.
4. (d) Li, C. J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5643.
5. (e) Chan, T. H.; Isaac, M. B. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 919.
6. (f) Li, C. J. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3095.
7. For recent examples, see: (a) Yu, C. Z.; Liu, B.; Hu, L. Q. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 919.
8. (b) Talukdar, S.; Fang, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 330.
9. (c) Laskar, D. D.; Prajapati, D.; Sandhu, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7883.
10. (d) Wang, L.; Li, P. H.; Zhou, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8141.
11. (e) Matsukawa, S.; Hinakubo, Y. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1221.
12. (a) Wang, L.; Zhou, L. H.; Zhang, Y. M. Synlett 1999, 1065.
13. (b) Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 10695.
14. (c) Liu, X.; Liu, Y. K.; Zhang, Y. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6787.
15. For reviews, see: (a) Ciganek, E. Org. React. (N.Y.) 1997, 51, 201.
16. (b) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, P. D.; Hyma, R. S. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8001.
17. (c) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811.
18. For recent examples, see: (a) Chandrasekhar, S.; Basu, D.; Rambabu, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3059.
19. (b) Shanmugarn, P.; Rajasingh, P. Synlett 2005, 939.
20. (c) Das, B.; Majhi, A.; Banerjee, J.; Chowdhury, N.; Venkateswarlu, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7913.
21. (d) Das, B.; Mahender, G.; Chowdhury, N.; Banerjee, J. Synlett 2005, 1000.
22. (e) Kabalka, G. W.; Venkataiah, B.; Dong, G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3803.
23. (f) Kabalka, G. W.; Venkataiah, B.; Dong, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4673.
24. (a) Liu, Y. K.; Li, J.; Zheng, H.; Xu, D. Q.; Xu, Z. Y.; Zhang, Y. M. Synlett 2005, 2999.
25. (b) Liu, Y. K.; Xu, D. Q.; Xu, Z. Y.; Zhang, Y. M. J. Zhejiang Univ. Science, B 2006, 7, 393.
26. (c) Li, J.; Wang, X. X.; Zhang, Y. M. Synlett 2005, 1039.
27. (d) Li, J.; Wang, X. X.; Zhang, Y. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5233.
28. Liu, Y. K.; Xu, X. S.; Zheng, H.; Xu, D. Q.; Xu, Z. Y.; Zhang, Y. M. Synlett 2006, 571.
29. 4. After evaporation of the solvent, the residue was purified by chromatography [cyclohexane-EtOAc (9:1) (R = alkyl groups) or cyclohexane-EtOAc (6:1) (R = aryl groups)].
30. (a) Karchner, J. H. The Analytical Chemistry of Sulfur and its Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1972.
31. (b) Ogawa, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3271.
32. (c) Antebi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 2609.
33. (a) Parry, R. J. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 1215.
34. (b) Arora, A.; Tripathi, C.; Shukla, Y. Curr. Cancer Ther. Rev. 2005, 1, 199.
35. (c) Arora, A.; Seth, K.; Shukla, Y. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 941.
36. (d) Thomas, R. D.; Green, M.; Wilson, C.; Sadrud-Din, S. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 787.
37. (e) Green, M.; Wilson, C.; Newell, O.; Sadrud-Din, S.; Thomas, R. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2005, 43, 1323.
38. All Baylis-Hillman acetates were prepared according to the literature: (a) Hoffman, H. M. R.; Rabe, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 795.
39. (b) David, H. O.; Kenneth, M. N. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6427.
40. According to NOESY experiments, there is no NOE correlation between the signal of the internal olefin proton and the allylic methylene protons.
41. The trisubstituted cinnamic ester moiety manifests a significant role in several biologically active compounds, see: (a) Senokuchi, K.; Nakai, H.; Nakayama, Y.; Odagaki, Y.; Sakaki, K.; Kato, M.; Maruyama, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Ito, H.; Kamiyasu, K.; Kim, S.; Kawamura, M.; Hamanaka, N. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4508.
42. (b) Senokuchi, K.; Nakai, H.; Nakayama, Y.; Odagaki, Y.; Sakaki, K.; Kato, M.; Maruyama, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Ito, H.; Kamiyasu, K.; Kim, S.; Kawamura, M.; Hamanaka, N. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2521.
43. (c) Watanabe, T.; Hayashi, K.; Yoshimatsu, S.; Sakai, K.; Takeyama, S.; Takashima, K. J. Med. Chem. 1980, 23, 50.
44. (2E)-Methyl cinnamic eaters prepared from Baylis-Hillman adducts or derivatives by other approaches, see: (a) Shadakshari, U.; Nayak, S. K. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4599.
45. (b) Ravichandran, S. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 2055.
46. (c) Das, B.; Banerjee, J.; Majhi, A.; Mahender, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 9225.
47. (d) Li, J.; Qian, W. X.; Zhang, Y. M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5793.
48. (e) Li, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1931.
49. (f) Chandrasekhar, S.; Chandrashekar, G.; Vijeender, K.; Reddy, M. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3475.