Preliminary assessment of activity analysis and modeling for homeland security applications

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1942, 2006, Pages 23-30

  Henson, Kriste M ^a,b   Goulias, Konstadinos G ^b  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA ACQUISITION; FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING; SURVEYS;

ACTIVITY ANALYSIS; DATA SOURCES; HOMELANMD SECURITY APPLICATIONS; POTENTIAL TARGETS;

SECURITY SYSTEMS;

EID: 33749339245     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1942-04     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Ettema, D. F., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Elsevier Science, Inc., New York, 1997, p. xiii.
2. General Accounting Office. Combating Terrorism: Threat and Risk Assessments Can Help Prioritize and Target Program Investments. Report GAO/NSIAD-98-74. Washington, D.C., 1998.
3. Government Accountability Office. Transportation Security: Systematic Planning Needed to Optimize Resources. Testimony Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate. Report GAO-05-357T. Washington, D.C., Feb. 15, 2005.
4. General Accounting Office. Homeland Security: A Risk Management Approach Can Guide Efforts. Testimony Before Senate Committee on Government Affairs. Report GAO-02-208T. Washington, D.C., Oct. 31, 2001.
5. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Top Officials (TOPOFF) Exercise Series: TOPOFF 2 After Action Summary Report for Public Release. Washington, D.C., Dec. 19, 2003.
6. O'Connor, P. Mixed Results from TOPOFF II: Homeland Security Undersecretary Brown. The Hill, June 4, 2003.
7. DeBlasio, A. J., R. Brodesky, M. E. Zirker, and T. J. Regan. Effects of Catastrophic Events on Transportation System Management and Operations: A Cross Cutting Study. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Cambridge, Mass., 2003.
8. Lenntorp, B. Paths in Space-Time Environment: A Time Geographic Study of Possibilities of Individuals. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography No. 44, Royal University of Lund, Sweden, 1976.
9. Huigen, P. P. P. Binnen of buiten bereik?: Een sociaal-geografisch onderzoek in Zuidwest-Friesland. Nederlandse Geografische Studies 7, University of Utrecht, Netherlands, 1986.
10. Jones, P. M., M. C. Dix, M. I. Clarke, and I. G. Heggie. Understanding Travel Behaviour. Gower, Aldershot, England, 1983.
11. Adler, T., and M. Ben-Akiva. A Theoretical and Empirical Model of Trip Chaining Behavior. Transportation Research B, Vol. 13B, 1979, pp. 243-257.
12. Kawakami, S., and T. Isobe. Development of a Travel-Activity Scheduling Model Considering Time Constraint and Temporal Transferability Test of the Model. In Selected Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transport Research, Vol. 4, Yokohama, Japan, Ventura: Western Periodicals, 1989, pp. 221-233.
13. Recker, W. W., M. G. McNally, and G. S. Root. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior: Part I - Theoretical Development. Transportation Research A, Vol. 20A, No. 4, 1986a, pp. 307-318.
14. Recker, W. W., M. G. McNally, and G. S. Root. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior: Part II - An Operational Model. Transportation Research A, Vol. 20A, No. 4, 1986b, pp. 319-330.
15. Garling, T., K. Brannas, J. Garvill, R. G. Golledge, S. Gopal, E. Holm, and E. Lindberg. Household Activity Scheduling. In Transport Policy, Management,and Technology Towards 2001: Selected Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transport Research, Vol. 4, Yokohama, Japan, Ventura: Western Periodicals, 1989, pp. 235-248.
16. Hayes-Roth, B., and F. Hayes-Roth. A Cognitive Model of Planning. Cognitive Science, Vol. 3, 1979, pp. 275-310.
17. Sparmann, U. Ein verhaltensorientiertes Simulationsmodell zur Verkehrsprognose. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Verkehrswesen 20, Universität (TH) Karlsruhe, Germany, 1980.
18. Goulias, K. G., and R. Kitamura. Travel Demand Forecasting with Dynamic Microsimulation. In Transportation Research Record 1357, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 8-17.
19. Goulias, K. G., and R. Kitamura. Regional Travel Demand Forecasting with Dynamic Microsimulation Models. Chapter 13 in Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications (T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and L. Long, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1997, pp. 321-348.
20. Chung, J.-H., and K. G. Goulias. Travel Demand Forecasting Using Microsimulation: Initial Results from Case Study in Pennsylvania. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 24-30.
21. Kitamura, R., E. I. Pas, C. V. Lula, T. K. Lawton, and P. E. Benson. The Sequenced Activity Simulator (SAMS): An Integrated Approach to Modeling Transportation, Land Use, and Air Quality. Transportation, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 267-291.
22. Ettema, D., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. SMASH (Simulation Model of Activity Scheduling Heuristics): Some Simulations. In Transportation Research Record 1551, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 88-94.
23. Ettema, D., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. Competing Risk Hazard Model of Activity Choice, Timing, Sequencing, and Duration. In Transportation Research Record 1493, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 101-109.
24. Dijst, M., and V. Vidakovic. Individual Action Space in the City. In Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (D. F. Ettema and H. J. P. Timmermans, eds.), Elsevier Science, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 117-134.
25. Recker, W. W. The Household Activity Pattern Problem: General Formulation and Solution. Transportation Research B, Vol. 29, 1995, pp. 61-77.
26. Kitamura, R. Applications of Models of Activity Behavior for Activity-Based Demand Forecasting. In Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference: Summary, Recommendations and Compendium of Papers (L. J. Engelke, ed.), Report of the Travel Model Improvement Program, Texas Transportation Institute. Arlington, Tex., 1997, pp. 119-150.
27. Kwan, M.-P. GISICAS: An Activity-Based Travel Decision Support System Using a GIS-Interfaced Computational-Process Model. In Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (D. F. Ettema and H. J. P. Timmermans, eds.), Elsevier Science, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 263-282.
28. Ma, J. An Activity-Based and Micro-Simulated Travel Forecasting System: A Pragmatic Synthetic Scheduling Approach. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1997.
29. Vause, M. A Rule-Based Model of Activity Scheduling Behavior. In Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (D. F. Ettema and H. J. P. Timmermans, eds.), Elsevier Science, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 73-88.
30. Ettema, D. F., A. Daly, G. de Jong, and E. Kroes. Towards an Applied Activity-Based Travel Demand Model. Presented at International Association of Travel Behavior Research (IATBR) Conference, Austin, Tex., 1997.
31. Fellendorf, M., T. Haupt, U. Heidi, and W. Scherr. PTV Vision: Activity Based Demand Forecasting in Daily Practice. In Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (D. F. Ettema and H. J. P. Timmermans, eds.), Elsevier Science, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 55-72.
32. Stopher, P. R., D. T. Hartgen, and Y. Li. SMART: Simulation Model for Activities, Resources, and Travel. Transportation, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 293-312.
33. Ben-Akiva, M., J. L. Bowman, and D. Gopinath. Travel Demand Model System for the Information Era. Transportation, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 241-266.
34. Bowman, J. L., M. Bradley, Y. Shiftan, T. K. Lawton, and M. BenAkiva. Demonstration of an Activity-Based Model System for Portland. Presented at 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, Belgium, June 1998.
35. Los Alamos National Laboratory. TRANSIMS: Transportation Analysis System (Version 3.1). LA-UR-00-1725. Los Alamos, N.M., 2003.
36. Kitamura, R., C. Chen, and R. M. Pendyala. Generation of Synthetic Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 154-162.
37. Arentze, T., and H. Timmermans. ALBATROSS - A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies (EIRASS), Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2000.
38. Arentze, T., F. Hofman, and H. Timmermans. Reinduction of Albatross Decision Rules with Pooled Activity-Travel Diary Data and an Extended Set of Land Use and Cost-Related Condition States. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 230-239.
39. Veldhuisen, J., H. Timmermans, and L. Kapoen. RAMBLAS: A Regional Planning Model Based on the Microsimulation of Daily Activity Travel Patterns. Transportation Research A, Vol. 32, 2000, pp. 427-443.
40. McNally, M. G., and A. Kulkarni. A Microsimulation of Daily Activity Patterns. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
41. Sundararajan, A., and K. G. Goulias. Demographic Microsimulation with DEMOS 2000: Design, Validation, and Forecasting. In Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications (K. G. Goulias, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003, pp. 14-1 to 14-23.
42. Fosgerau, M. PETRA - An Activity-Based Approach to Travel Demand Analysis. In National Transport Models: Recent Developments and Prospects (L.-G. Mattson and L. Lundquist, eds.). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, Springer, 2001.
43. Timmermans, H. Models of Activity Scheduling Behaviour. In Tagungsband zum 2 (K. J. Beckmann, ed.), Aachener Kolloquium "Mobilität und Stadt" (AMUS 2001), Institut für Stadtbauwesen und Stadtverkehr, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen, Germany, 2001, pp. 33-47.
44. Alam, S. B., and K. G. Goulias. Dynamic Emergency Evacuation Management System Using Geographic Information System and Spatiotemporal Models of Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1660, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 92-99.
45. Bhat, C. R., and S. K. Singh. A Comprehensive Daily Activity-Travel Generation Model System for Workers. Transportation Research A, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-22.
46. Bhat, C. R. Comprehensive and Operational Analysis Framework for Generating Daily Activity-Travel Pattern of Workers. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
47. Wang, D., and H. Timmermans. Conjoint-Based Model of Activity Engagement, Timing, Scheduling, and Stop Pattern Formation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1718, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 10-17.
48. Wen, C.-H., and F. S. Koppelman. A Conceptual and Methodological Framework for the Generation of Activity-Travel Patterns. Transportation, Vol. 27, 2000, pp. 5-23.
49. Kuhnau, J. L., and K. G. Goulias. Centre SIM: Hour-by-Hour Travel Demand Forecasting for Mobile Source Emission Estimation. In Development and Application of Computer Techniques to Environmental Studies IX (C. A. Brebbia and P. Zannetti, eds.), WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 2002, pp. 257-266.
50. Kuhnau, J., and K. G. Goulias. Centre SIM: First-Generation Model Design, Pragmatic Implementation, and Scenarios. In Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications (K. G. Goulias, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003, pp. 16-1 to 16-14.
51. Goulias, K. G., M. Zekkos, and J. Eom. CentreSIM3 Scenarios for the South Central Centre County Transportation Study. CentreSIM3 Report submitted to McCormick Taylor Associates and the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center, University Park, Pa., 2004.
52. Timmermans, H., T. Arentze, and C.-H. Joh. Modeling Effects of Anticipated Time Pressure on Execution of Activity Programs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1752, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 8-15.
53. Joh, C.-H., T. Arentze, and H. Timmermans. Activity-Travel Scheduling and Rescheduling Decision Processes: Empirical Estimation of Aurora Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1898, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 10-18.
54. Pribyl, O., and K. G. Goulias. Simulation of Daily Activity Patterns, Chapter 3. In Progress in Activity-Based Analysis (H. Timmermans, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005, pp. 43-65.
55. Salvini, P., and E. J. Miller. ILUTE: An Operational Prototype of a Comprehensive Microsimulation Model of Urban Systems. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.
56. Miller, E. J., and M. J. Roorda. Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 114-121.
57. Bhat, C. R, J. Guo, S. Srinivasan, and A. Sivakumar. Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling for Metropolitan Areas in Texas: Software-Related Processes and Mechanisms for the Activity-Travel Pattern Generation Microsimulator. Research Report 4080-5. Center for Transportation Research, Austin, Tex., 2003.
58. van Middelkoop, M., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. Merlin: Microsimulation System for Predicting Leisure Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 20-27.
59. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, A. Kikuchi, T. Yamamoto, and S. Fujii. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator: Overview and Preliminary Validation Results. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123-130.
60. Vovsha, P., E. Petersen, and R. Donnelly. Microsimulation in Travel Demand Modeling: Lessons Learned from the New York Best Practice Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 68-77.
61. Vovsha, P., E. Petersen, and R. Donnelly. Explicit Modeling of Joint Travel by Household Members: Statistical Evidence and Applied Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 1-10.
62. Jonnalagadda, N., J. Freedman, W. A. Davidson, and J. D. Hunt. Development of Microsimulation Activity-Based Model for San Francisco: Destination and Mode Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1777, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 25-35.
63. Stefan, K., P. McMillan, and J. D. Hunt. Urban Commercial Vehicle Movement Model for Calgary. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.