Spatial characteristics of serial sexual assault in New Zealand

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 218-231

  Lundrigan, Samantha ^a   Czarnomski, Sarah ^b,c  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749318284     PISSN: 00048658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/acri.39.2.218     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Brantingham, P.J., & Brantingham, P.L. (1981). Environmental criminology. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
3. Brantingham, P.L., & Brantingham, P.J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.
4. Canter, D., & Gregory, A. (1994). Identifying the residential location of rapists. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 34(3), 169-175.
5. Canter, D., & Larkin, P. (1993). The environmental range of serial rapists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 63-69.
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
7. Cornish, D., & Clarke, R.V. (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York: Springer Verlag.
8. Davidson, N. (1980). Patterns of residential burglary in Christchurch. New Zealand Geographer, 36(2), 73-78.
9. Davies, A., & Dale, A. (1995). Locating the stranger rapist (Home Office Police Research Group Special Interest paper 3).
10. Kocsis, R.N., & Irwin, H.J. (1997). An analysis of spatial patterns in serial rape, arson and burglary: The utility of the circle theory of environmental range for psychological profiling. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 4, 195-206.
11. Le Beau, J.L. (1987a). The journey to rape: Geographic distance and the rapist's method of approaching the victim. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 129-161.
12. Le Beau, J.L. (1987b). The methods and measures of centrography and the spatial dynamics of rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 125-141.
13. Lundrigan, S., & Canter, D. (2001). A multivariate analysis of serial murderes' disposal site location choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 423-432
14. Meaney, R. (2004). Commuters and marauders: An examination of the spatial behaviour of serial criminals. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1 (2), 121-137.
15. Miethe, T.D., & McCorkle, R. (1998). Crime profiles: The anatomy of dangerous person, places and situations. University of Nevada, LA: Roxbury.
16. National Statistics. (2004). Population density, 2002, regional trends 38. Retrieved March, 2005, from www.statistics.gov.uk
17. New Zealand Information Centre. (2003). Private transport. Retrieved March, 2005, from www.newzealand-infocentre.com
18. Rhodes, W.M., & Conly, C. (1981). Crime and mobility: An empirical study. In P.J. Brantingham & P.L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
19. Statistics New Zealand Te Tari Tatau. (2003). New Zealand: Population density. Retrieved March, 2005, from www.stats.govt.nz
20. Tamura, M., & Suzuki, M. (1997). Criminal profiling research on serial arson: Examination of circle hypothesis estimating offenders residential area. Reports of National Research Institute of Police Science, 38, 13-25.
21. US Census Bureau. Population, housing units, area and density 2000. Retrieved March, 2005, from http://factfinder.census.gov
22. Warren, J.I., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R.R., Cummings, A., Gibbs, N., & Trumbetta, S. (1998). Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 35-59.
23. Zipf, G. (1950). The principle of least effort. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.