Increasing the availability of vasectomy in public-sector clinics

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1997, Pages

  Haws, Jeanne M ^a   McKenzie, Maureen ^a   Mehta, Manisha ^a   Pollack, Amy E ^a  

^a United States Programs   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AVAILABILITY--CHANGES; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECONOMIC FACTORS; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; FAMILY PLANNING; FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS; FAMILY PLANNING TRAINING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LOW INCOME POPULATION--MEN; MACROECONOMIC FACTORS; MALE; MALE STERILIZATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STAFF; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PHYSICIAN; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TRAINING PROGRAMS; UNITED STATES; VASECTOMY; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORKLOAD;

AMERICAS; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AVAILABILITY--CHANGES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC FACTORS; EDUCATION; FAMILY PLANNING; FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS; FAMILY PLANNING TRAINING; HEALTH; HEALTH PERSONNEL; LOW INCOME POPULATION--MEN; MACROECONOMIC FACTORS; MALE STERILIZATION; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; PHYSICIANS; PUBLIC SECTOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; STERILIZATION, SEXUAL; TRAINING PROGRAMS; UNITED STATES; VASECTOMY;

AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; MEDICAL INDIGENCY; MEDICAL STAFF; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC SECTOR; VASECTOMY; WORKLOAD;

EID: 33749285837     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2953384     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. C. Marquette et al., "Vasectomy in the United States, 1991," American Journal of Public Health, 83:644-619,1994.
2. R. Forste, K. Tanfer and L. Tedrow, "Sterilization Among Currently Married Men in the United States, 1991," Family Planning Perspectives, 27:100-107&122, 1995.
3. W. D. Mosher, "Contraceptive Practice in the United States, 1982-1984" Family Planning Persivctiivs, 22:198-205 1990.
4. C. Marquette et al., 1994, op. cit. (see reference 1).
5. The Alan Guttmacher Institute, Uneven and Unequal: Insurance Coverage and Reproductive Health Services, New York, 1994.
6. J. J. Frost and M. Bolzan, "The Provision of Public-Sector Services by Family Planning Agencies in 1995," Family Planning Perspectives, 29:5-14,1997
7. L. Ku, "Financing of Family Planning Services," re-port to the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1993.
8. B. Gonzales et al., No-Scalpel Vascclomy: An Illustrated Guide for Surgeons, AVSC International, New York, 1992.
9. J. Trussell et al., "The Economic Value of Contraception: A Comparison of 15 Methods," American Journal of Public Health, 85:494-5011995.
10. K. Ringheim, "Factors That Determine Prevalence of Use of Contraceptive Methods for Men," Studies in Family Planning, 24:87-99,1993.