Learning user preferences for sets of objects

ICML 2006 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 273-280

  DesJardins, Marie ^a   Eaton, Eric ^a   Wagstaff, Kiri L ^b  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; USER INTERFACES;

KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION; LEARNING PROBLEM; MUSIC DATA COLLECTION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33749261993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Analytical Methods Committee (2001). Representing data distributions with kernel density estimates (Technical Report AMC Technical Brief No. 4). Royal Society of Chemistry.
2. Barbera, S., Bossert, W., & Pattanaik, P. K. (2004). Ranking sets of objects. In S. Barbera, P. J. Hammond and C. Seidl (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory, vol. 2: Extensions, chapter 17. Springer.
3. Boutilier, C. (2002). Solving concisely expressed com binatorial auction problems. Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 359-366).
4. Brafman, R. I., Domshlak, C., Shimony, S. E., & Silver, Y. (2005). Preferences over sets. Working Notes of the IJCAI-05 Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling.
5. Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., & Hullender, G. (2005). Learning to rank using gradient descent. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 89-96).
6. Burke, R. (2002). Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12, 331-370.
7. Carbonell, J., & Goldstein, J. (1998). The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reodering documents and producing summaries. Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'98) (pp. 335-336). ACM Press.
8. Caruana, R., Baluja, S., & Mitchell, T. (1996). Using the future to 'sort out' the present: Rankprop and multitask learning for medical risk evaluation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Proceedings of NIPS 95) (pp. 959-965). MIT Press.
9. Chu, W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005). Preference learning with Gaussian processes. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 137-144).
10. Cohen, W. W., Schapire, R. E., & Singer, Y. (1999). Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10, 243-270.
11. Crammer, K., & Singer, Y. (2001). Pranking with ranking. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (pp. 641-647).
12. Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.). (2006). Combinatorial auctions. MIT Press.
13. desJardins, M., & Wagstaff, K. L. (2005). DD-PREF: A language for expressing preferences over sets. Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 620-626).
14. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2001). Pattern classification. Wiley-Interscience. Second edition.
15. Freund, Y., Iyer, R., Schapire, R. E., & Singer, Y. (2003). An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 933-969.
16. Gill, P. E., & Murray, W. (1976). Minimization subject to bounds on the variables. National Physical Laboratory.
17. Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (1981). Practical optimization. Academic Press.
18. Herbrich, R., Graepel, T., Bollmann-Sdorra, P., & Obermayer, K. (1998). Learning preference relations for information retrieval. Proceedings of the Learning for Text Categorization AAAI Workshop (pp. 83-86).
19. Price, B., & Messinger, P. R. (2005). Optimal recommendation sets: Covering uncertainty over user preferences. Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 541-548).
20. Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann. Second edition.
21. Zhai, C., Cohen, W. W., & Lafferty, J. (2003). Beyond independent relevance: Methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. Proceedings of SIGIR'03(pp. 10-17).
22. Zwicker, E., & Fastl, H. (1990). Psychoacoustics, facts and models. Springer-Verlag.