Average ground-state energy of finite Fermi systems

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Centelles, M ^a   Leboeuf, P ^b   Monastra, A G ^c   Roccia, J ^b   Schuck, P ^d   Vinas X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^c DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d CENTRE DE CALCUL DE L INSTITUT NATIONAL DE PHYSIQUE NUCLEAIRE ET DE PHYSIQUE DES PARTICULES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749260557     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.034332     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. M. Brack and R. K. Bhaduri, Semiclassical Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997).
2. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).
3. V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/0375-9474(67) 90510-6 A95, 420 (1967);
4. V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. 0375-9474 10.1016/0375-9474(68)90699-4 A122, 1 (1968).
5. N. H. March, Self-Consistent Fields in Atoms (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975).
6. O. Bohigas, X. Campi, H. Krivine, and J. Treiner, Phys. Lett. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(76)90101-5 B64, 381 (1976).
7. I. Zh. Petkov and M. V. Stoitsov, Nuclear Density Functional Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991).
8. M. Centelles, X. Viñas, M. Barranco, and P. Schuck, Ann. Phys. (NY) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1006/aphy.1993.1007 221, 165 (1993).
9. M. Centelles, P. Schuck, and X. Viñas, Ann. Phys. (in press) [nucl-th/0601092].
10. F. A. Ivanyuk and V. M. Strutinsky, Z. Phys. A ZAANEE 0930-1151 10.1007/BF01435276 293, 337 (1979);
11. F. A. Ivanyuk, Z. Phys. A 0340-2193 10.1007/BF01412268 316, 233 (1984).
12. K. Pomorski, Phys. Rev. C PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044306 70, 044306 (2004).
13. B. L. Altshuler, Y. Gefen, and Y. Imry. Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.88 66, 88 (1991).
14. S. Grossmann and M. Holthaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3557 79, 3557 (1997).
15. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.40.749 40, 749 (1932);
16. J. G. Kirkwood, Phys. Rev. 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.44.31 44, 31 (1933);
17. G. E. Uhlenbeck and E. Beth, Physica 3, 729 (1936).
18. H. P. Baltes and E. R. Hilf, Spectra of Finite Systems (Bib-liographisches Institut-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1976).
19. R. K. Bhaduri and C. K. Ross, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.606 27, 606 (1971).
20. M. Brack and H. C. Pauli, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/0375-9474(73)90355-2 A207, 401 (1973).
21. B. K. Jennings, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/0375-9474(73)90860-9 A207, 538 (1973).
22. B. K. Jennings, R. K. Bhaduri, and M. Brack, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/0375-9474(75)90119-0 A253, 29 (1975).
23. We use the notation E=Ē+E~,N=N̄+N~, etc. to indicate the total, average, and fluctuating parts of each magnitude. However, in the axis labels of the figures where different approximations are compared, we shall write only E,N, etc.
24. R. Balian and C. Bloch, Ann. Phys. (NY) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/0003-4916(72)90006-1 69, 76 (1972).
25. M. C. Gutzwiller, J. Math. Phys. 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1664927 10, 1004 (1969).
26. P. Leboeuf, Lect. Notes Phys. 652, 245 (2004).
27. M. Brack and S. R. Jain, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.3462 51, 3462 (1995).
28. O. Bohigas and P. Leboeuf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.092502 88, 092502 (2002);
29. O. Bohigas and P. Leboeuf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.129903 88 129903 (2002).
30. H. Olofsson, S. Åberg, O. Bohigas, and P. Leboeuf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.042502 96, 042502 (2006).
31. P. Leboeuf and A. G. Monastra, Ann. Phys. (NY) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1006/aphy.2002.6246 297, 127 (2002).
32. M. Centelles, X. Viñas, M. Durand, P. Schuck, and D. Von-Eiff, Ann. Phys. (NY) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1006/aphy.1998.5792 266, 207 (1998).
33. B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16, 1 (1986).
34. G. A. Lalazissis, S. Raman, and P. Ring, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables ADNDAT 0092-640X 10.1006/adnd.1998.0795 71, 1 (1999).
35. We have made an exception to the rule of selecting the most bound isotope for each mass number in the case of A=40. The most bound A=40 nucleus is Ar40 (Z=18,N=22). However, in Figs. 7 and 8 we display the results for Ca40 instead of Ar40, because Ca40 is one of the scarce examples of a stable nucleus with a double shell closure (Z=N=20).
36. G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003 A729, 337 (2003).
37. A. G. Monastra, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris XI, 2001, http://www.physik.tu-dresden.de/monastra/CV.html