Quantification of the roles of trabecular microarchitecture and trabecular type in determining the elastic modulus of human trabecular bone

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1608-1617

  Liu, Xiaowei S ^a   Sajda, Paul ^a   Saha, Punam K ^b   Wehrli, Felix W ^b   Guo, X Edward ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

CT imaging; Digital topology; Microarchitecture; Osteoporosis; Trabecular type

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MASS; BONE STRUCTURE; BONE VOLUME FRACTION; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL TOPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MICROARCHITECTURE; MU COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRABECULAR BONE; TRABECULAR PLATE; TRABECULAR ROD; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS;

EID: 33749257128     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060716     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anonymous 1991 Concensus Development Conference: Prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1:114-117.
2. Hansson TH, Roos B, Nachemson A 1980 The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae. Spine 5:46-54.
3. McBroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, Goldberg RP, White AAI 1985 Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1206-1214.
4. Mosekilde L 1986 Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: Relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. Bone 7:207-212.
5. Silva MJ, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC 1997 Load sharing between the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body. Spine 22:140-150.
6. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA 1988 On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21:155-168.
7. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CCJ 1988 Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804-1809.
8. Jensen KS, Mosekilde L 1990 A model of vertebral trabecular bone architecture and its mechanical properties. Bone 11:417-423.
9. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M 1989 The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:3-11.
10. Parfitt AM 1984 Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: Cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tissue Int 36(Suppl 1):S123-S128.
11. Whiterhouse WJ 1974 The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone. J Microsc 101:153-168.
12. Odgaard A 1997 Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone 20:315-328.
13. Odgaard A, Jensen EB, Gundersen HJ 1990 Estimation of structural anisotropy based on volume orientation. J Microsc 157:149-162.
14. Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS 1983 Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 72:1396-1409.
15. Compston JE 1994 Connectivity of cancellous bone: Assessment and mechanical implications. Bone 15:463-466.
16. Kabel J, Odgaard A, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R 1999 Connectivity and the elastic properties of cancellous bone. Bone 24:115-120.
17. Kinney JH, Ladd AJ 1998 The relationship between three-dimensional connectivity and the elastic properties of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 13:839-845.
18. Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA 1994 The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 27:375-389.
19. Van Rietbergen B, Odgaard A, Kabel J, Huiskes R 1998 Relationships between bone morphology and bone elastic properties can be accurately quantified using high-resolution computer reconstructions. J Orthop Res 16:23-28.
20. Zysset PK, Sonny M, Hayes WC 1994 Morphology-mechanical property relations in trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic proximal tibia. J Arthroplasty 9:203-216.
21. Pothuaud L, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Benhamou CL, Levitz P 2000 A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: Application to trabecular bone architecture. J Microsc 199:149-161.
22. Pothuaud L, Van Rietbergen B, Mosekilde L, Beuf O, Levitz P, Benhamou CL, Majumdar S 2002 Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 35:1091-1099.
23. Pothuaud L, Newitt DC, Lu Y, MacDonald B, Majumdar S 2004 In vivo application of 3D-line skeleton graph analysis (LSGA) technique with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure. Osteoporos Int 15:411-419.
24. Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ 2001 Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 16:1520-1531.
25. Saha PK, Chaudhuri BB 1994 Detection of 3-D simple points for topology preserving. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16:1028-1032.
26. Saha PK, Chaudhuri BB 1996 3D Digital Topology under Binary Transformation with Applications. Comput Vis Image Underst 63:418-429.
27. Saha PK, Chaudhuri BB, Majumder DD 1997 A new shape preserving parallel thinning algorithm for 3D digital images. Pattern Recog 30:1939-1955.
28. Saha PK, Gomberg BR, Wehrli FW 2000 Three-dimensional digital topological characterization of cancellous bone architecture. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 11:81-90.
29. Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Wehrli FW 2000 Topological analysis of trabecular bone MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:166-174.
30. Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM 1998 Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech 31:601-608.
31. Chang WC, Christensen TM, Pinilla TP, Keaveny TM 1999 Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric. J Orthop Res 17:582-585.
32. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM 2001 Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 34:569-577.
33. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, Wachtel EF, McMahon TA, Hayes WC 1994 Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech 27:1127-1136.
34. Hoshen J, Kopelman R 1976 Percolation and cluster distribution. I. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm. Phys Rev B 14:3438-3445.
35. Saha PK, Chaudhuri BB, Chanda B, Dutta Majumder D 1994 Topology Preservation in 3D digital space. Pattern Recog 27:295-300.
36. Hollister SJ, Brennan JM, Kikuchi N 1994 A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. J Biomech 27:433-444.
37. Guo XE, Goldstein SA 1997 Is trabecular bone tissue different from cortical bone tissue? Forma 12:185-196.
38. Chappard D, Legrand E, Haettich B, Chales G, Auvinet B, Eschard JP, Hamelin JP, Basle MF, Audran M 2001 Fractal dimension of trabecular bone: Comparison of three histomorphometric computed techniques for measuring the architectural two-dimensional complexity. J Pathol 195:515-521.
39. Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L 1998 Relationships between static histomorphometry and bone strength measurements in human iliac crest bone biopsies. Bone 22:153-163.
40. Guo XE, Kim CH 2002 Mechanical consequence of trabecular bone loss and its treatment: A three-dimensional model simulation. Bone 30:404-411.
41. Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P 1997 A new method for the model independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 185:67-75.
42. Guldberg RE, Hollister SJ, Charras GT 1998 The accuracy of digital image-based finite element models. J Biomech Eng 120:289-295.
43. Niebur GL, Yuen JC, Hsia AC, Keaveny TM 1999 Convergence behavior of high-resolution finite element models of trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng 121:629-635.
44. Chappard D, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Legrand E, Basle MF, Audran M 2005 Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT. J Bone Miner Res 20:1177-1184.
45. Hordon LD, Itoda M, Shore PA, Shore RC, Heald M, Brown M, Kanis JA, Rodan GA, Aaron JE 2006 Preservation of thoracic spine microarchitecture by alendronate: Comparison of histology and microCT. Bone 38:444-449.
46. Ding M, Hvid I 2000 Quantification of age-related changes in the structure model type and trabecular thickness of human tibial cancellous bone. Bone 26:291-295.
47. Laib A, Kumer JL, Majumdar S, Lane NE 2001 The temporal changes of trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by MicroCT. Osteoporos Int 12:936-941.