Reality versus simulation

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 137-141

  Srinivasan, Srilekha ^a   Pérez, Lance C ^a   Palmer, Robert D ^b   Brooks, David W ^a   Wilson, Kathleen ^a   Fowler, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering education; Instructional design; Motivation; Simulation; Working memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749256284     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andrade, J. (2001). The working memory model: Consensus, controvery, and future directions. In Andrade J. (Ed.), Working memory in perspective pp. 281-310. Psychology Press, Ltd, East Sussex.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation pp. 47-90.VIII Academic Press, New York.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
5. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
6. Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, M., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence 32: 277-296.
7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and Self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenaum Press.
8. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
9. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Miyake A., & Shah P. (Eds.), Models of working memory Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Ericsson, K. A., & Delaney, P. F. (1999). Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance. In Miyake A., & Shah P. (Eds.), Models of working memory pp. 257-297. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Hidi, S., Renninger, A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In Dai D. Y., & Sternberg R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition pp. 89-115. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
12. Huang D. W., Diefes-Dux H., Imbrie P. K., Daku B., Kallimani J. G. (2004). Learning motivation evaluation for a computer-based instructional tutorial using arcs model of motivational design. Savannah, GA.
13. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westpost, CT: Praeger Publishers.
14. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memor. Psychological Review 99: 122-149.
15. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 38(1): 23-31.
16. Keller, J. M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction 26(9): 1-8.
17. Linebarger, D. L., Kosanic, A. Z., Greenwood, C. R., & Doku, N. S. (2004). Effects of viewing the television program between the lions on the emergent literacy skills of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology 92(2): 297-308.
18. Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognition and Science 4: 333-369.
19. MathWorks T. (2005). Matlab® - the language of technical computing. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from hup://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
20. Mayor, R. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Cognition and Science 26: 49-63.
21. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Renkl, A. (2002). Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & instruction 12: 529-556.
23. Schraw, G., Brooks, D. W., Crippen, K. J. (2005). Improving chemistry instruction using an interactive, compensatory model of learning. Journal of Chemical Education 81, in press.
24. Shapiro, A. (2004). How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research. American Educational Research Journal 41(1): 159-189.
25. Srinivasan, S. (2004). Implementation of an integral signals and systems laboratory in electrical engineering courses: A study. Unpublished MA, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
26. Srinivasan, S., Pérez, L. C., Palmer, R. D. and Anderson, M. F. (2003a, November 5-7, 2003). Assessing laboratory effectiveness in electrical engineering courses. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, Boulder, CO.
27. Srinivasan, S., Pérez, L. C., Palmer, R. D., Anderson, M. F., and Boye, A. J. (2003b, June 22-25, 2003a). An integrated signals and systems laboratory at the university of nebraska: Laboratory philosophy and study design. Paper presented at the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN.
28. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camber-well, Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
29. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction 2: 59-89.
30. TIMS. (2005). Tims telecommunication: University, modulation, transmission, wireless. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.qpsk.com/ html/qpsk.html
31. Trainin, G., Wilson, K., Wickless, M., & Brooks, D. (2005). Extraordinary animals and expository writing: Zoo in the classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14(3): 299-304.
32. Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load assoicated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology 91(2): 334-341.
33. Wade, S. E., Buxton, W. M., & Kelly, M. (1999). Using think-alouds to examine reader-text interest. Reading Research Quarterly 34: 194-216.