Molecular complexity analysis of de novo designed ligands

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 49, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 5869-5879

  Boda, Krisztina ^a   Johnson, A Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NAPHTHALENE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DE NOVO DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN; LIGAND BINDING; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN MOTIF; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33749250361     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm050054p     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Muegge, I. Selection criteria for drug-like compounds. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 302-321.
2. Walters, W. P.; Murcko, M. A. Prediction of 'drug-likeness'. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2002, 54, 255-271.
3. Walters, W. P.; Stahl, M. T.; Murcko, M. A. Virtual screening - an overview. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3, 160-178.
4. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.
5. Fecik, R. A.; Frank, K. E.; Gentry, E. J.; Menon, S. R.; Mitscher, L. A;.; Telikepalli, H. The search for orally active medications through combinatorial chemistry. Med. Res. Rev. 1998, 18, 149-185.
6. Xu, J.; Stevenson, J. Drug-like index: A new approach to measure drug-like compounds and their diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1177-1187.
7. Muegge, I.; Heald, S. L.; Brittelli, D. Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1841-1846.
8. Rishton, G. M. Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS. Drug Discovery Today 1997, 2, 382-384.
9. Wagener, M.; van Geerestein, V. J. Potential drugs and nondrugs: Prediction and identification of important structural features. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 280-292.
10. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Identification of biological activity profiles using substructural analysis and genetic algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 165-179.
11. Ajay; Walters, W. P.; Murcko, M. A. Can we learn to distinguish between "druglike" and "nondruglike" molecules?. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
12. Sadowski, J.; Kubinyi, H. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
13. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2887-2893.
14. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. Properties of known drugs. 2. Side chains. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5095-5099.
15. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55-68.
16. Lewell, X. Q.; Judd, D. B.; Watson, S. P.; Hann, M. M. RECAP - Retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure: A powerful new technique for identifying privileged molecular fragments with useful applications in combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 511-522.
17. Sheridan, R. P. The most common chemical replacements in drug-like compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 103-108.
18. Wang, J.; Ramnarayan, K. Toward designing drug-like libraries: A novel computational approach for prediction of drug feasibility of compounds. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 524-533.
19. Gillet, V. J.; Myatt, G.; Zsoldos, Z.; Johnson A. P. SPROUT, HIPPO and CAESA: Tools for de novo structure generation and estimation of synthetic accessibility. Perspect. Druq Discovery Des. 1995, 3, 34-50.
20. Gillet, V. J.; Newell, W.; Mata, P.; Myatt, G.; Sike, S.; Zsoldos, Z.; Johnson, A. P. Sprout-recent developments in the de-novo design of molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 207-217.
21. Morgan, H. L. Generation of a unique machine description for chemical structures-a technique developed at chemical abstracts service. J. Chem. Doc. 1965, 5, 107-113.
22. Wipke, W. T.; Dyott, T. M. Stereochemically Unique Naming Algorithm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 4834-4842.
23. RxList LLC, The Top 200 Prescriptions for 2003 by Number of US Prescriptions Dispensed. url: http://www.rxlist.com/top200.html.
24. Baldwin, J.; Farajallah, A. M.; Malmquist, N. A.; Rathod, P. K.; Phillips, M. A. Malarial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 41827-41834.