A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 990-994

  Preutthipan, Sangchai ^a   Herabutya, Yongyoth ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cervical priming; dinoprostone; hysteroscopic surgery; misoprostol; operative hysteroscopy

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIARRHEA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG INDUCED HEADACHE; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; HYPERTHERMIA; HYSTEROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MYOMECTOMY; NAUSEA; NULLIPARA; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SURGICAL PATIENT; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING; UTERUS DISEASE; UTERUS PERFORATION; UTERUS SYNECHIA; VAGINA BLEEDING; VOMITING;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVIX UTERI; DINOPROSTONE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; MISOPROSTOL; OXYTOCICS; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREMEDICATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33749242210     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.039     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Itzkowic D., and Beale M. Uterine perforation associated with endometrial ablation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 32 (1992) 359-361
2. Loffer F.D. Complications of hysteroscopy-their cause, prevention, and correction. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3 (1995) 11-26
3. Vilos G.A., Vilos E.C., and King J.H. Experience with 800 hysteroscopic endometrial ablations. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4 (1996) 33-38
4. Preutthipan S., and Herabutya Y. A randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol 94 (1999) 427-430
5. Preutthipan S., and Herabutya Y. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 96 (2000) 892-894
6. Lokugamage A.U., Forsyth S.F., Sullivan K.R., El Rafaey H., and Rodeck C.H. Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82 (2003) 133-137
7. 2 for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 116 (2004) 34-38
8. Rozenberg P., Chevret S., Senat M.V., Bretelle F., Paule Bonnal A., and Ville Y. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004) 247-253
9. Le Roux P.A., Olarogun J.O., Penny J., and Anthony J. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized control trial. Obstet Gynecol 99 (2002) 201-205
10. Langenegger E.J., Odendaal H.J., and Grove D. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet 88 (2005) 242-248
11. Gregson S., Waterstone M., Norman I., and Murrells T. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term. BJOG 112 (2005) 438-444
12. Preutthipan S., and Theppisai U. Outcome of hysteroscopic resection of submucous myoma: a result of 50 procedures at Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 81 (1998) 190-194
13. Jansen F.W., Vredevoogd C.B., Ulzen K.V., Hermans J., Trimbos J.B., and Trimbos-Kemper T.C. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 96 (2000) 266-270
14. Hill D., Maher P., Wood C., Lawrence A., Downing B., and Lolatgis N. Complications of operative hysteroscopy. Gynaecol Endosc 1 (1992) 185-189