Backward compatible high dynamic range MPEG video compression

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 713-723

  Mantiuk, Rafał ^a   Efremov, Alexander ^a   Myszkowski, Karol ^a   Seidel, Hans Peter ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Backward compatibility; High dynamic range; MPEG; Prefiltering; Tone mapping; Video compression; Visible difference predictor; Visual masking; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE (HDR); LUMINANCE; MPEG; PREFILTERING; TONE MAPPING; VISIBLE DIFFERENCE PREDICTOR; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

CONFORMAL MAPPING; CORRELATION METHODS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; VIDEODISKS; WAVE FILTERS;

IMAGE COMPRESSION;

EID: 33749237846     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 07300301     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1141911.1141946     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. AHUMADA, A., AND PETERSON, H. 1993. Luminance-model-based DCT quantization for color image compression. In Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display, SPIE, volume 3299, 191-201.
2. BENNETT, E. P., AND MCMILLAN, L. 2005. Video enhancement using per-pixel virtual exposures, ACM Trans. on Graph, 24, 3, 845-852.
3. BOGART, R., KAINZ, F., AND HESS, D. 2003, OpenEXR image file format. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003. Sketches & Applications.
4. BOLIN, M. R., AND MEYER, G. W. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 1998, 299-309.
5. BORDER, P., AND GUILLOTEL, P. 2000. Perceptually adapted MPEG video encoding. In Proc. of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, SPIE. volume 3959, 168-175.
6. BRADLEY, A. P. 1999. A wavelei visible difference predictor. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 8, 5, 717-730.
7. DALY, S. J., AND FENG, X. 2003, Bit-depth extension using spatiotemporal microdither based on models of the equivalent input noise of the visual system. In Color Imaging VIII: Processing, Hardcopy. and Applications, SPIE, volume 5008, 455-466.
8. DALY, S. J., AND FENG, X. 2004. Decontouring: Prevention and removal of false contour artifacts. In Proc. of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, SPIE, vol. 5292, 130-149.
9. DALY, S, 1993. The Visible Differences Predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Image and Human Vision, Cambridge, MA; MIT Press, A. Watson, Ed., 179-206.
10. DEMOS. G. 2004, High quality, wide dynamic range, compression system. In SMPTE Technical Conference Proceedings.
11. DRAGO, F., MYSZKOWSKI, K., ANNEN, T., AND CHIBA, N. 2003. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes, Computer Graphics Forum. Proceedings of Eurographics 2003 22, 3, 419-426.
12. DURAND, F., AND DORSEY, J. 2002. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Trans. on Graph. 21, 3, 257-266.
13. FATTAL, R., LISCHINSKI, D., AND WERMAN, M. 2002. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression, ACM Trans. on Graph. 21, 3, 249-256.
14. FERWERDA, J. A., SHIRLEY, P., PATTANAIK, S. N., AND GHEENBERG, D. P. 1997, A model of visual masking for computer graphics. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 1997, 143-152.
15. KRAWCZYK, G., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2005. Perceptual effects in real-time tone mapping, In SCCG '05: Proc. of the 21st Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, 195-202.
16. LI, Y., SHARAN, L., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2005. Compressing and companding high dynamic range images with subband architectures. ACM Trans. on Graph. 24, 3, 836-844.
17. LUCIAN, I., FELICIA, S., CHARLES, S., AND SIEFKIEN, H. 2005, Digital encode and method of encoding high dynamic range video images. In US Patent 6,867,717.
18. MANTIUK, R., KRAWCZYK, G., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2004, Perception-motivated high dynamic range video encoding. ACM Trans. on Graph. 23, 3, 730-738.
19. MANTIUK, R., DALY, S., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2005. Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images - model und its calibration, In Proc. of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging X, SPIE, volume 5666, 204-214.
20. MANTIUK, R., EFREMOV, A., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2006. Design und evaluation of backward compatible high dynamic range video compression. MPI Technical Report MPI-1-2006-4-001.
21. MANTIUK, R., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2006. Lossy compression of high dynamic range images und video, In Proc. of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XI, SPIE, Sun Jose, USA, vol. 6057 of Proceedings of SPIE, 60570V.
22. MATUSIK, W., AND PFISTER, H. 2004. 3D TV: a scalable system for real-time acquisition, transmission, and autostereoscopic display of dynamic scenes. ACM Trans. on Graph. 23, 3, 814-824.
23. PATTANAIK, S., TUMBLIN, J., YEE, H., AND GREENBERG. D. 2000, Time-dependent visual adaptation for realistic image display. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 47-54.
24. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, M., PATTANAIK, S. N., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis, In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 1999, 73-82.
25. REINHARD, E., STARK, M., SHIRLEY, P., AND FERWERDA, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Trans. on Graph. 21, 3, 267-276.
26. REINHARD, E., WARD, G., PATTANAIK, S., AND DEBEVEC, P. 2005. High Dynamic Range Imaging. Data Acquisition. Manipulation, and Display. Morgan Kaufmann.
27. SAFRANEK, R. J. 1993. JPEG compliant encoder using perceptually based quantization, In Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, SPIE, volume 1913, 117-126.
28. SEETZEN, H., HEIDRICH, W., STUERZLINGER, W., WARD, G., WHITE-HEAD, L., TRENTACOSTE, M., GHOSH, A., AND VOROZCOVS, A. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. ACM Trans. on Graph. 23, 3, 757-765.
29. SPAULDING, K. E., WOOLFE, G. J., AND JOSHI, R. L. 2003. Using u residual image to extend the color gamut und dynamic range of an sRGB image. In Proc, of IS&T PICS Conference, 307-314.
30. WANG, Z., AND BOVIK, A. 2002. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9, 3, 81-84.
31. WARD, G., AND SIMMONS, M. 2004. Subband encoding of high dynamic range imagery. In APGV '04; 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 83-90.
32. WARD, G., AND SIMMONS, M. 2005, JPEG-HDR: A backwards-compatible, high dynamic range extension to JPEG. In Proceedings of the 13th Color Imaging Conference, 283-290.
33. WARD LARSON, G. 1998. LogLuv encoding for full-gamut, high-dynamic range images. Journal of Graphics Tools 3, 1, 815-30.
34. WATSON, A. B., SOLOMON, J. A., AHUMADA, A., AND GALE, A. 1994. DCT basis function visibility: Effects of viewing distances and contrast masking. In Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display V, SPIE, volume 2179, 99-108.
35. WATSON, A. 1987, The cortex transform: Rapid computation of simulated neural images. Comp. Vis, Graph. and Image Proc. 39, 311-327.
36. WENJUN, Z., DALY, S., AND SHAWMIN, L. 2000. Visual optimization tools in JPEG 2000, In IEEE Intern. Conf. on Image Processing, 37-40.
37. XU, R., PATTANAIK, S., AND HUGHES, C. 2005, High-dynamic range still-image encoding in JPEG 2000. IEEE Comp. Graph. and Appl. 26, 6, 57-64.