The generalised Liar Paradox: A quantum model and interpretation

Foundations of Science

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 399-418

  Broekaert, Jan ^a   Aerts, Diederik ^a   D'Hooghe, Bart ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE INTERACTION; CONTEXTUALITY; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; QUANTUM MECHANICAL; QUANTUM MODELING; THEORETICAL PHYSICS; TIME INVARIANCE; TRUTH VALUES;

ABSTRACTING;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 33749189219     PISSN: 12331821     EISSN: 15728471     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10699-004-6248-8     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. D. Aerts 1982 Description of Many Physical Entities Without the Paradoxes Encountered in Quantum Mechanics Foundations of Physics 12 1131-1170 10.1007/BF00729621
2. D. Aerts 1983a Classical Theories and Non Classical Theories as a Special Case of a More General Theory Journal of Mathematical Physics 24 2441-2453 10.1063/1.525626
3. Aerts, D.: 1983b, The Description of One and Many Physical Systems. In C. Gruber (eds.), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Lausanne: A.V.C.P.63-148
4. D. Aerts 1986 A Possible Explanation for the Probabilities of Quantum Mechanics Journal of Mathematical Physics 27 202-210 10.1063/1.527362
5. D. Aerts 1992 The Construction of Reality and its Influence on the Understanding of Quantum Structures International Journal of Theoretical Physics 31 1815-1837 10.1007/BF00678294
6. D. Aerts 1994 Quantum Structures, Separated Physical Entities and Probability Foundations of Physics 24 1227-1259 10.1007/BF02148566
7. D. Aerts 1999 Foundations of Quantum Physics: A General Realistic and Operational Approach International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38 289-358 10.1023/A:1026605829007
8. Aerts, D., J. Broekaert and L. Gabora (1999). Nonclassical Contextuality in Cognition: Borrowing From Quantum Mechanical Approaches to Indeterminism and Observer Dependence, Dialogues in Psychology 10.
9. Aerts, D., J. Broekaert and L. Gabora (2000). Intrinsic Contextuality as the Crux of Consciousness. In K. Yasue, M. Jibu and T. Della Senta (eds.), Proceedings of Fundamental Approaches to Consciousness, Tokyo '99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
10. Aerts, D., J. Broekaert and L. Gabora (2002). A Case for Applying an Abstracted Quantum Formalism to Cognition. In M.H. Bickhard and R.L. Campbell (eds.), Mind in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
11. Aerts, D., J. Broekaert and S. Smets (1999). The Liar-Paradox in a Quantum Mechanical Perspective, Foundations of Science 4:115-132. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0007047.
12. Aerts, D., J. Broekaert and S. Smets (2000). A Quantum Structure Description of the Liar-Paradox, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38:3231-3239. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0106131.
13. Pitowsky, I. (1989). Quantum Probability-Quantum Logic. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 321: Wien: Springer-Verlag.