Adaptive mesh refinement techniques for high-order shock capturing schemes for multi-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 455-471

  Baeza, Antonio ^a   Mulet, Pep ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptive mesh refinement; Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws; Shu Osher conservative scheme

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTERPOLATION;

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; DONAT-MARQUINA FLUX SPLITTING METHOD; HIGH-ORDER SHOCK CAPTURING SCHEME; HYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATION; HYPERBOLIC SYSTEM; SHU-OSHER CONSERVATIVE SCHEME;

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS;

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTERPOLATION;

EID: 33749183928     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1191     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Harten A, Hyman JM. Self-adjusting grid methods for one-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1983; 50(2):235-269.
2. Osher S, Sanders R. Numerical approximations to nonlinear conservation laws with locally varying time and space grids. Mathematics of Computation 1983; 41(164):321-336.
3. Tan Z, Zhang Z, Huang Y, Tang T. Moving mesh methods with locally varying time steps. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 200(1):347-367.
4. Berger MJ. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 1982.
5. Berger MJ, Oliger J. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 53:484-512.
6. Berger MJ, Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 82:64-84.
7. Quirk JJ. An adaptive grid algorithm for computational shock hydrodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, 1991.
8. Shu C-W, Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1988; 77(2):439-471.
9. Shu C-W, Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 83(1):32-78.
10. Jiang G-S, Shu C-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 126:202-228.
11. Donat R, Marquina A. Capturing shock reflections: an improved flux formula. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 125:42-58.
12. Marquina A, Mulet P. A flux-split algorithm applied to conservative models for multicomponent compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 185(1):120-138.
13. Haas J-F, Sturtevant B. Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical inhomogeneities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1987; 181:41-76.
14. Donat R, Font J, Ibánez J-M, Marquina A. A flux-split algorithm applied to relativistic flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 146:58-81.
15. Liu X-D, Osher S, Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 115:200-212.
16. Quirk JJ, Karni S. On the dynamics of a shock-bubble interaction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1996; 318: 129-163.
17. Chiavassa G, Donat R. Point value multiscale algorithms for 2D compressible flows. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2001; 23:805-823 (electronic).