Effects of tillage systems on the soil physical properties of a dystrophic Red Latosol;Efeitos de sistemas de preparo nas propriedades físicas de um Latossolo vermelho distrófico

Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 137-147

  Cavalieri, Karina Maria Vieira ^a   Tormena, Cássio Antonio ^b,c   Filho, Pedro Soares Vidigal ^b,c   Gonçalves, Antonio Carlos Andrade ^b,c   Da Costa, Antonio Carlos Saraiva ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

^c Bolsista do CNPq   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Least limiting water range; Soil bulk density; Soil physical quality; Soil resistance to penetration; Soil water retention

Indexed keywords

MANIHOT ESCULENTA;

EID: 33749181557     PISSN: 01000683     EISSN: 18069657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832006000100014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BENJAMIN, J.G.; NIELSEN, D.C. & VIGIL, M.F. Quantifying effects of soil conditions on plant growth and crop production. Geoderma, 116:137-148, 2003.
2. BETZ, D.L.; ALLMARAS, R.R.; COPELAND, S.M. & RANDALL, G.W. Least limiting water range: traffic and long-term tillage influences in a Webster soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62:1384-1393, 1998.
3. BEUTLER, A.N.; CENTURION, J.F.; SOUZA, Z.M.; ANDRIOLI, I. & ROQUE, C.G. Retenção de água em dois tipos de latossolos sob diferentes usos. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 26:829-834, 2002.
4. BLAKE, G.R. & HARTGE, K.H. Bulk density. In: KLUTE, A., ed. Methods of soil analysis. 2.ed. Madison, American Society of Agronomy, 1986. p.363-375.
5. BUSSCHER, W.J. Adjustment of flat-tipped penetrometer resistance data to a common water content. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 33:519-524, 1990.
6. CORSINI, P.C. & FERRAUDO, A.S. Efeitos de sistemas de cultivo na densidade e macroporosidade do solo e no desenvolvimento radicular do milho em Latossolo Roxo. Pesqec. Agrop. Bras., 34, 289-298, 1999.
7. EAVIS, B.W. Soil physical conditions affecting seedling root growth. I. Mechanical impedance, aeration and moisture availability as influenced by bulk density and moisture levels in a sandy loam soil. Plant Soil, 36:613-622, 1972.
8. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA - EMBRAPA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Rio de Janeiro, 1999. 412p.
9. GLANTZ, S.A. & SLINKER, B.K. Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1990. 777p.
10. GODOY, H.; CORREA, A.R. & SANTOS, D. Clima do Paraná. In: FUNDAçãO INSTITUTO AGRONÔMICO DO PARANÁ. Londrina, Manual Agropecuário para o Paraná, 1976. 178p.
11. HILL, R.L. & CRUSE, R.M. Tillage effects on bulk density and soil strength of two Mollisols. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49:1270-1273, 1985.
12. HILL, R.L.; HORTON, R. & CRUSE, M.R. Tillage effects on soil water retention and pore size distribution of two Mollisols. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49:1264-1270, 1985.
13. HOWELER, R.H.; EZUMAH, H.C. & MIDMORE, D.J. Tillage systems for root and tuber crops in the tropics. Soil Till. Res., 27:211-240, 1993.
14. IMHOFF, S.; SILVA, A.P. & TORMENA, C.A. Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties in areas under elephant-grass short-duration grazing systems. Plant Soil, 219:161-168, 2000.
15. KAY, B.D. Assessing the suitability of different soils for new cropping systems in terms of rates of change in soil structure. In: LARSON, W.E.; BLAKE, G.R.; ALLMARAS, R.R.; VOORHEES, W.B. & GUPTA, S.C., eds. Mechanics and related processes in structured agricultural soils. Dordrecht, NATO series in Applied Sciences, 1989. p.223-232.
16. KLUTE, A. Water retention: Laboratory methods. In: KLUTE, A., ed. Methods of soil analysis. 2.ed. Madison, American Society of Agronomy, 1986. p.635-660.
17. LAL, R. Management in the developing countries. Soil Sci., 165:57-72, 2000.
18. LAPEN, D.E.; TOPP, G.C.; GREGORICH, E.G. & CURNOE, W.E. Least limiting water range indicators of soil quality and corn production, eastern Ontario, Canada. Soil Till. Res., 78:151-170, 2004.
19. LETEY, J. Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Adv. Soil Sci., 1:277-294, 1985.
20. LIBARDI, P.L.; MANFRON, P.A.; MORAES, S.O. & TUON, R.L. Variabilidade da umidade gravimétrica de um solo hidromórfico. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 20:1-12, 1996.
21. MARIA, I.C.; CASTRO, O.M. & DIAS, H.S. Atributos físicos do solo e crescimento radicular da soja em latossolo roxo sob diferentes métodos de preparo do solo. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 23:703-709, 1999.
22. NETER, J.; KUTNER, M. H.; NACHTSHEIM, C. J.; WASSERMAN, W. Qualitative preditor variables; Regression approach to singe-factor analysis of variance. In: NETER, J.; KUTNER, M. H.; NACHTSHEIM, C. J. & WASSERMAN, W., eds. Applied linear statistical models. 4.ed. Chicago, 1996. p.455-496.
23. OLIVEIRA, J.O.A.P.; VIDIGAL FILHO, P.S.; TORMENA, C.A.; PEQUENO, M.G.; SCAPIM, C.A.; MUNIZ, A.S. & SAGRILO, E. Influência de sistemas de preparo do solo na produtividade da mandioca (Manihot esculenta, Crantz). R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 25:443-450, 2001.
24. O'SULLIVAN, M.F. & BALL, B.C. The shape of the water release characteristic as affected by tillage, compaction and soil type. Soil Till. Res., 25:339-340, 1993.
25. RASIAH, V. & AYLMORE, L.A.G. Sensitivity of selected water retention functions to compaction and inherent soil properties. Aust. J. Soil Res., 36:317-326, 1998.
26. REEVE, M.J.; SMITH, P.D. & THOMASSON, A.J. The effect of density on water retention properties of field soils. J. Soil Sci., 24:355-367, 1973.
27. SHAPIRO, S.S. & WILK, M.B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52:591-611, 1965.
28. SILVA, A.P. & KAY, B.D. Effect of soil water content variation on the least limiting water range. Soil. Sc. Soc. Am. J., 61:884-888, 1997.
29. SILVA, A.P.; KAY, B.D. & PERFECT, E. Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils. Soil. Sc. Soc. Am, J., 58:1775-1781, 1994.
30. SILVA, A.P. & KAY, B.D. The sensivity of shoot growth of corn to the least limiting water range of soils. Plant Soil, 184:323-329, 1996.
31. SOJKA, R.E.; BUSSCHER, W.J. & LEHRSCH, G.A. In situ strength, bulky density, and water content relations of a Durinodic xeric haplocalcid soil. Soil Soi., 166:520-529, 2001.
32. TORMENA, C.A. & SILVA, A.P. Incorporação da densidade no ajuste de dois modelos à curva de retenção de água no solo. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 26:305-314, 2002.
33. TORMENA, C.A.; SILVA, A.P. & LIBARDI, P.L. Caracterizaçã o do intervalo hídrico ótimo de um Latossolo Roxo sob plantio direto. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 22:573-581, 1998.
34. TORMENA, C.A.; SILVA, A.P. & LIBARDI, P.L. Soil physical quality of a Brazilian Oxisol under two tillage systems using the least limiting water range approach. Soil Till. Res., 52:223-232, 1999.
35. van der BERG, van der M.; KLAMT, E.; van REEUWIJK & SOMBROEK, W.G. Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils. Geoderma, 78:161-180, 1997.
36. van GENUCHTEN, M.Th. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sc. Soc. Am. J., 44:892-898, 1980.
37. WATANABE, S.H.; TORMENA, C.A.; ARAÚJO, M.A.; VIDIGAL FILHO, P.S.; PINTRO, J.C.; COSTA, A.C.S. & MUNIZ, A.S. Propriedades físicas de um latossolo vermelho distrófico influenciadas por sistemas de preparo do solo utilizados para implantação da cultura da mandioca. Acta Sci., 24:1255-1264, 2002.
38. ZOU, C.; SANDS, R.; BUCHAN, G. & HUDSON, I. Least limiting water range: a potential indicator of physical quality of forest soils. Aust. J. Soil Res., 38:947-958, 2000.