Undisciplined research: The proceduralisation of quality control in transdisciplinary projects

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 411-421

  Guggenheim, Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NONE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD (REGULATION);

EID: 33749173851     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154306781778795     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abbott, Andrew 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abbott, Andrew 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information/ Information sur les Sciences Sociales, 14, 19-47.
4. Breslau, Daniel 1997. Contract shop epistemology: credibility and problem construction in applied social science. Social Studies of Science, 27(3), 363-394.
5. Bröckling, Ulrich 2000. Totale Mobilmachung. Menschenführung im Qualitäts- und Selbstmanagement. In Gouvemementalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen, eds. Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann et al, pp. 131-167. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
6. Brown, Barry 2001. Representing time. the humble timesheet as a representation and some details of its completion and use. Ethnographic Studies, 6, 13-20.
7. Cochoy, Franck, Jean-Pierre Garel and Gilbert de Terssac 1998. Comment l'Ecrit Travaille l'Organisation: Le Cas des Normes ISO 9000. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, 39(4), 673-699.
8. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Martin Trow et al 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Thousand Oaks; and New Delhi: Sage.
9. Girard, Monique and David Stark 2002. Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new media projects. Environment and Planning A, 34(11), 1927-1949.
10. Guggenheim, Michael 2005. Organisierte Umwelt. Intersystemische Wissensproduktion in Umweltdienstleistungsfirmen. Bielefeld, Transcript.
11. Hirschauer, Stefan 2004. Peer Review auf dem Prüfstand. Zum Soziologiedefizit der Wissenschaftsevaluation. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 33, 62-83.
12. Hobday, Mike 2000. The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7-8), 871-893.
13. Kipping, Matthias 2002. Trapped in their wave: the evolution of management consultancies. In Critical Consulting: New Perspectives on the Management Advice Industry, eds. Timothy Clark and Robin Fincham, pp. 28-49. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Klein, Julie Thompson, Walter Grossenbacher-Mansuy and Rudolf Häberli eds. 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Basel: Birkhäuser.
15. Knights, David and Darren McCabe 2000. "Ain't misbehavin'"? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of "quality" management. Sociology, 34(3), 421-436.
16. Knorr Cetina, Karin 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17. Latour, Bruno 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18. Mendel, Peter James 2002. Global Models of Organizations: International Management Standards, Reforms, and Movements. Dissertation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19. Merton, Robert King 1973. The normative structure of science. In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. Robert King Merton, pp. 267-278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Nelkin, Dorothy 1977. Scientists and professional responsibility: the experience of American ecologists. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 75-95.
21. Pestre, Dominique 2000. The production of knowledge between academies and markets: a historical reading of the book "The New Production of Knowledge". Science, Technology and Society, 5(2), 169-181.
22. Pohl, Christian 2001. How to bridge between natural and social sciences? An analysis of three approaches to transdisciplinarity from the Swiss and German field of environmental research. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés, 9(3), 37-46.
23. Power, Michael 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Reverdy, Thomas 2000. Les Formats de la Gestion des Rejets Industriels: Instrumentation de la Coordination et Enrolement dans une Gestion Transversale. Sociologie du Travail, 42(2), 225-243.
25. Stichweh, Rudolf 1994. Professionen und Disziplinen: Formen der Differenzierung zweier Systeme beruflichen Handelns in modemen Gesellschaften. In Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen, ed. Rudolf Stichweh, pp. 278-336. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
26. Strathern, Marilyn ed. 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.
27. SVU-ASEP 2001. Dienstleistungsverzeichnis der Beratungsfirmen im Umweltbereich. Bern.
28. Townley, Barbara 1998. Beyond good and evil: depth and division in the management of human resources. In Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of the Self, eds. Alan McKinlay and Ken Starkey, pp. 191-210. London: Sage.
29. Turner, Stephen 2000. What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? In Practising Interdisciplinarity, eds. Peter Weingart and Nico Stehr, pp. 46-65. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
30. Van Herk, R, N S Klazinga, R M J Schepers et al 2001. Medical audit: threat or opportunity for the medical profession. A comparative study of medical audit among medical specialists in general hospitals in the Netherlands and England, 1970-1999. Social Science and Medicine, 53(12), 1721-1732.
31. Weber, Max 1988. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.
32. Weingart, Peter 1987. Interdisziplinarität als List der Institution, In Interdisziplinarität. Praxis - Herausforderung - Ideologie, ed. Jürgen Kocka, pp. 159-166. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.