Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes with TVD central differencing for the water hammer equations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 571-590

  Wahba, E M ^a  

^a Alexandria University The Faculty Of Engineering   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Runge Kutta scheme; Unsteady friction; Water hammer

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; INTERNAL FRICTION; LAMINAR FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIPE FLOW; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES; WATER HAMMER;

BALDWIN-LOMAX MODELS; CEBECI-SMITH MODEL; TOTAL VARIATION DIMINISHING (TVD); UNSTEADY FRICTION;

UNSTEADY FLOW;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; INTERNAL FRICTION; LAMINAR FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIPE FLOW; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; UNSTEADY FLOW; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES; WATER HAMMER;

EID: 33749171748     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1188     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ghidaoui MS, Zhao M, McInnis DA, Axworthy DH. A review of water hammer theory and practice. ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews 2005; 58(1):49-76.
2. Wylie EB, Streeter VL. Fluid Transients in Systems. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
3. Tan JK, Ng KC, Nathan GK. Application of the centre implicit method for investigation of pressure transients in pipelines. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1987; 7(4):395-406.
4. Hwang Y, Chung N. A fast Godunov method for the water-hammer problem. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 40(6):799-819.
5. Szymkiewicz R, Mitosek M. Analysis of unsteady pipe flow using the modified finite element method. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 21(4):183-199.
6. Zielke W. Frequency-dependent friction in transient pipe flow. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 1968; 90(1):109-115.
7. Brunone B, Golia UM, Greco M. Some remarks on the momentum equation for fast transients. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydraulic Transients with Water Column Separation, IAHR, Valencia, Spain, 1991; 201-209.
8. Brunone B, Golia UM, Greco M. Modeling of fast transients by numerical methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydraulic Transients with Water Column Separation, IAHR, Valencia, Spain, 1991; 273-280.
9. Brunone B, Golia UM, Greco M. Effects of two-dimensionality on pipe transients modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1995; 121(12):906-912.
10. Vardy AE, Hwang KL, Brown J. A weighting function model of transient turbulent pipe friction. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1993; 31(4):533-548.
11. Vardy AE, Brown J. Transient, turbulent, smooth pipe friction. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1995; 33(4):435-456.
12. Vardy AE, Brown J. Efficient approximation of unsteady friction weighting functions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2004; 130(11):1097-1107.
13. Bratland O. Frequency-dependent friction and radial kinetic energy variation in transient pipe flow. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pressure Surges, British Hydrodynamics Research Association, Cranfield, U.K., 1986; 95-101.
14. Nathan GK, Tan JK, Ng KC. Two-dimensional analysis of pressure transients in pipelines. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1988; 8(3):339-349.
15. Vardy AE, Hwang KL. A characteristics model of transient friction in pipes. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1991; 29(5):669-684.
16. Pezzinga G. Quasi-2D model for unsteady flow in pipe networks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1999; 676-685.
17. Brunelli MCP. Two-dimensional pipe model for laminar flow. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering 2005; 127:431-437.
18. Baldwin BS, Lomax H. Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 78-257 1978.
19. Smith AMO, Cebeci T. Numerical solution of the turbulent boundary layer equations. Douglas Aircraft Division Report DAC 33735 1967.
20. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-kutta time-stepping schemes. AIAA Paper 81-1259 1981.
21. Swanson RC, Turkel E. On central difference and upwind schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 101:292-306.
22. Holmboe EL, Rouleau WT. The effect of viscous shear on transients in liquid lines. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 1967; 89(1):174-180.
23. Wilcox D. Turbulence Modeling for CFD (2nd edn). DCW Industries, 1998.
24. Stokes G. On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1851; 9:8-106.
25. 2/vT. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2005; 21(4):435-440.