A cost-effective method for the optical transduction of chemical reactions. Application to hyaluronidase inhibitor screening with polyarginine-counteranion complexes in lipid bilayers

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 38, 2006, Pages 12420-12421

  Miyatake, Tomohiro ^a,b   Nishihara, Masamichi ^a,c   Matile, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KANAGAWA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANION; ENZYME INHIBITOR; HYALURONIDASE; POLYARGININE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; LIPID BILAYER; OPTICS; REACTION ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSDUCER;

ANIONS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; ENZYME INHIBITORS; HEPARIN; HYALURONOGLUCOSAMINIDASE; LIPID BILAYERS; OPTICS; PEPTIDES;

EID: 33749164306     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja064732o     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. (a) Futaki, S. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005, 57, 547-558.
2. (b) Umezawa, N.; Gelman, M. A.; Haigis, M. C.; Raines, R. T.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 368-369.
3. (c) Rothbard, J. B.; Jessop, T. C.; Lewis, R. S.; Murray, B. A.; Wender, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9506-9507.
4. (d) Hitz, T.; Iten, R.; Gardiner, J.; Namoto, K.; Walde, P.; Seebach, D. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 5817-5829.
5. (e) Fernandez-Carneado, J.; Van Gool, M.; Martos, V.; Castel, S.; Prados, P.; de Mendoza, J.; Giralt, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 869-874.
6. (f) Takeuchi, T.; Kosuge, M.; Tadokoro, A.; Sugiura, Y.; Nishi, M.; Kawata, M.; Sakai, N.; Matile, S.; Futaki, S. ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 299-303.
7. (a) Goddard, J. P.; Reymond, J. L. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15, 314-322.
8. (b) Rich, R. L.; Myszka, D. G. J. Mol. Recognit. 2005, 18, 431-478.
9. (c) Houseman, B. T.; Huh, J. H.; Kron, S. J.; Mrksich, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 270-274.
10. (a) Mio, K.; Stern, R. Matrix Biol. 2002, 21, 31-37.
11. (b) Toida, T.; Ogita, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Toyoda, H.; Imanari, T. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 370, 176-182.
12. (c) Botzki, A.; Rigden, D. J.; Braun, S.; Nukui, M.; Salmen, S.; Hoechstetter, J.; Bernhardt, G.; Dove, S.; Jedrzejas, M. J.; Buschauer, A. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45990-45997.
13. (a) Das, G.; Talukdar, P.; Matile, S. Science 2002, 298, 1600-1602.
14. (b) Sordé, N.; Das, G.; Matile, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 11964-11969.
15. (c) Litvinchuk, S.; Sordé, N.; Matile, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127, 9316-9317.
16. (d) Das, G.; Matile, S. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2936-2944.
17. (e) Sordé, N.; Matile, S. Biopolymers 2004, 76, 55-65.
18. (a) Nishihara, M.; Perret, F.; Takeuchi, T.; Futaki, S.; Lazar, A. N.; Coleman, A. W.; Sakai, N.; Matile, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1659-1669.
19. 1f support for a carrier mechanism includes biphasic kinetics for oligoarginine removal with heparin from and across intact vesicles, and U-tube activity: Sakai, N.; Takeuchi, T.; Futaki, S.; Matile, S. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 114-122.
20. (c) Sensitivity decreases with oligoarginine length: Sakai, N.; Matile S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14348-14356.
21. ATP = 4 with pR-DP transducers. This difference was sufficient to detect kinase activity but incompatible with binary "on/off" ATP/ADP discrimination. Studies on the limitations of the universal adaptability of optical counterion-polyion transducers are ongoing with particular emphasis on covalent in situ amplification of poorly recognized inactivating as well as activating analytes.
22. (a) Meldal, M.; Svendsen, I.; Breddam, K.; Auzanneau, F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 3314-3318.
23. (b) Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Shu, Z.; Gray, S. D.; Prestwich, G. D. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 895-902.
24. The detectability of substrate immobilization on solid support with pR-DP transducers identified another attractive field of application of the here reported method (see Supporting Information). Substrate immobilization is also convenient for Michaelis-Menten analysis to determine the nature of inhibition.