Perils and pitfalls of small negative clinical trials

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 101, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2185-2186

  Locke III, G Richard ^a,b   Zinsmeister, Alan R ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEW DRUG; PLACEBO;

ARTICLE; DRUG FATALITY; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG MONITORING; DRUG RESEARCH; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 33749162808     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00527.x     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:873-90.
2. Connor JT. The value of a p-valueless paper. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1638-40.