Risk stratification in penile carcinoma: 25-Year experience with surgical inguinal lymph node staging

Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 621-625

  Hungerhuber, Edwin ^a   Schlenker, Boris ^a   Karl, Alexander ^a   Frimberger, Dominic ^b   Rothenberger, Karl Heinz ^b   Stief, Christian G ^a   Schneede, Peter ^b  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Penile Cancer Working Group   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INGUINAL LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PENIS CANCER; PENIS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INGUINAL CANAL; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PENILE NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33749157648     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.052     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Windahl T., Skeppner E., Andersson S.O., et al. Sexual function and satisfaction in men after laser treatment for penile carcinoma. J Urol 172 (2004) 648-651
2. Lynch Jr. D., and Schellhammer P.F. Tumors of the penis. In: Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Vaughan Jr. E.D., et al. (Eds). Campbells' Urology. 7th ed. vol 3 (1998), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2453-2485
3. Ornellas A.A., Seixas A.L., Marota A., et al. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151 (1994) 1244-1249
4. Skinner D.G., Leadbetter W.F., and Kelley S.B. The surgical management of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 107 (1972) 273-277
5. Persky L., and deKernion J. Carcinoma of the penis. CA Cancer J Clin 36 (1986) 258-273
6. Bouchot O., Rigaud J., Maillet F., et al. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 45 (2004) 761-765
7. D'Ancona C.A., de Lucena R.G., Querne F.A., et al. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 498-501
8. Horenblas S., Jansen L., Meinhardt W., et al. Detection of occult metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis using a dynamic sentinel node procedure. J Urol 163 (2000) 100-104
9. Tanis P.J., Lont A.P., Meinhardt W., et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: reliability of a staging technique. J Urol 168 (2002) 76-80
10. Daseler E.H., Anson B.H., and Reimann A.F. Radical excision of the inguinal and iliac lymph glands: a study based upon 450 anatomical dissections and upon supportive clinical observations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 87 (1948) 679-684
11. Cabanas R.M. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39 (1977) 456-466
12. Pizzocaro G., Piva L., Bandieramonte G., et al. Up-to-date management of carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol 32 (1997) 5-15
13. Hussein A.M., Benedetto P., and Sridhar K.S. Chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for penile and urethral squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 65 (1990) 433-438
14. Horenblas S., van Tinteren H., Delemarre J.F., et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: accuracy of Tumor, Nodes and Metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology. J Urol 146 (1991) 1279-1283
15. Scappini P., Piscioli F., Pusiol T., et al. Penile cancer: aspiration biopsy cytology for staging. Cancer 58 (1986) 1526-1533
16. McDougal W.S., Kirchner Jr. F.K., Edwards R.H., et al. Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for primary lymphadenectomy. J Urol 136 (1986) 38-41
17. Perinetti E., Crane D.B., and Catalona W.J. Unreliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging penile carcinoma. J Urol 124 (1980) 734-735
18. Wespes E., Simon J., and Schulman C.C. Cabanas approach: is sentinel node biopsy reliable for staging penile carcinoma?. Urology 28 (1986) 278-279
19. Catalona W.J. Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 140 (1988) 306-310
20. Colberg J.W., Andriole G.L., and Catalona W.J. Long-term follow-up of men undergoing modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol 79 (1997) 54-57
21. Akduman B., Fleshner N.E., Ehrlich L., et al. Early experience in intermediate-risk penile cancer with sentinel node identification using the gamma probe. Urology 58 (2001) 65-68
22. Hungerhuber E., Frimberger D., Karl A., et al. Patients with penile cancer and palpable inguinal lymph nodes should not be staged by dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy. Eur Urol Suppl 3 (2004) 188
23. Wawroschek F., Vogt H., Bachter D., et al. First experience with gamma probe guided sentinel lymph node surgery in penile cancer. Urol Res 28 (2000) 246-249
24. Kroon B.K., Horenblas S., Lont A.P., et al. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 173 (2005) 816-819
25. Kroon B.K., Horenblas S., Meinhardt W., et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol 47 (2005) 601-606
26. McDougal W.S. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 154 (1995) 1364-1366
27. Solsona E., Iborra I., Ricos J.V., et al. Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 22 (1992) 115-118
28. Fraley E.E., Zhang G., Manivel C., et al. The role of ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy and significance of histological differentiation in treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 142 (1989) 1478-1482
29. Solsona E., Algaba F., Horenblas S., et al. EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 46 (2004) 1-8