Simultaneous hybrid of maxillary Le Fort I Halo distraction and mandibular set-back for patients with severe cleft jaw deformity

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 962-969

  Satoh, Kaneshige ^a   Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki ^a   Tosa, Yasuyoshi ^a   Kadamatsu, Kohichi ^a   Hosaka, Yoshiaki ^a  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cleft lip and palate; Halo distraction; Jaw deformity; Mandibular SSRO

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRACE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FACE MASK; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYBRID; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAW MALFORMATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA OSTEOTOMY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OCCLUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNATHIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPLINT; STANDARD; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CLEFT PALATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT;

EID: 33749143830     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000230017.62143.61     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cheung LK, Sammam N, Hiu E, et al. The 3-dimensional stability of maxillary osteotomies in cleft patients with residual alveolar clefts. Br J Oral Maxillfac Surg 1994;32:6
2. Eskenazi LB, Schendel SA. An analysis of Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:779
3. Herber SC, Lehman JA Jr. Orthognathic surgery in the cleft lip and palate patient. Clin Plast Surg 1993;20:755-768
4. Hirano A, Suzuki H. Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 2001;38:1-10
5. HochbanW, Gans C, Austermann KH. Long-term results after maxillary advancement in patients with clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:237
6. Jackson IT, Fasching MC. Secondary deformities of cleft lip, nose, and cleft palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Com: 2832-2840
7. Ko EW, Figueroa AA, Guyette TW, et al. Veloppharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 1999;10:312-320
8. Millard R Jr. Cleft Craft III. Boston: Little Brown and Com., 1980:933-971
9. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in chidhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external adjustable rigid distraction devices. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:181-185
10. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1360
11. Posnick JC, Dagys AP. Skeletal stability and relapse patterns after Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy fixed with miniplates: the unilateral cleft lip and palate deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:924
12. Ruberg RL, Randall P, Whitaker LA. Preservation of a posterior pharyngeal flap during maxillary advancement. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;57:335-338
13. Satoh K, Mitsukawa N, Kadomatsu K, et al. Direct skeletal traction replacing an intraoral dental splint and traction hook for Le Fort I Halo distraction. Ann Plast Surg 2004; accepted in Jan. 2004
14. Wong GB, Padwa BL. Le Fort I soft tissue distraction: a hybrid technique. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13:572-576