JOS comment: A special occupation: Commissioning an heirloom

Journal of Occupational Science

Volumn 13, Issue 2-3, 2006, Pages 145-148

  Ilott, Irene ^a  

^a Catherine Mounter ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bereavement; Consumer behaviour; Heirlooms; Objects

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749137774     PISSN: 14427591     EISSN: 21581576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9726507     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. 5 cherished possessions become families’ inalienable wealth. Journal of Consumer Research, 31,609-622.
3. Gibson, S. (2000). Habitat: An examination of the relationship between self identity and the possession and display of household goods. The International Journal of Urban Labour and Leisure, 2(1), Retrieved November 11, 2005, from http://www.ijuH.org/vol2/1/000012.htm
4. Hocking, C. (1994). A model of interaction between objects, occupation, society and culture. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 1(3), 28-45.
5. Hocking, C. (1997). Person-object interaction model: Understanding the use of everyday objects. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(1), 27-35.
6. Hocking, C. (2000). Having and using objects in the Western world. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(3), 148-157.
7. Howell, D., & Pierce, D. (2000). Exploring the forgotten restorative dimensions of occupation: Quilting and quilt use. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 68-72.
8. Lillios, K. T. (1999). Objects of memory: The ethnography and archaeology of heirlooms. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 6(3), 235-262.
9. Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2004). The reflexive relationship between consumer behaviour and adaptive coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 441-454.