Transport distraction osteogenesis using nitinol spring: An exploration in canine mandible

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 943-949

  Zhou, Hong Zhi ^a   Hu, Min ^b   Hu, Kai Jin ^a   Yao, Jun ^b   Liu, Yan Pu ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Canine model; Mandible; Nitinol spring; Transport distraction osteogenesis

Indexed keywords

NITINOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE MASS; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; EXPERIMENTATION; JAW MALFORMATION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOOTH;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DOGS; ELASTICITY; MANDIBLE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE;

EID: 33749137286     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000236437.74850.26     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Idelsohn S, Pena J, Lacroix D, et al. Continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis using superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA). J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:541-546
2. Mofid MM, Inoue N, Tufaro AP, et al. Spring-mediated mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:756-762
3. Zhou HZ, Hu M, Yao J, et al. Rapid lengthening of rabbit mandibular ramus by using nitinol spring: a preliminary study. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:725-729
4. Hikiji H, Takato T, Matsumoto S, et al. Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1270-1276
5. Warren SM, Mehrara BJ, Steinbrech DS, et al. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: part III. Gradual distraction versus acute lengthening. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:441-453
6. Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH, et al. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:507-513
7. Stewart KJ, Lvoff GO, White SA, et al. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a comparison of distraction rates in the rabbit model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:43-49
8. Swennen G, Dempf R, Schliephake H. Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: experimental studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:123-135
9. Costantino PD, Shybut G, Friedman CD, et al. Segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis. An experimental study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:535-545
10. Rubio-Bueno P, Sanroman F, Garcia P, et al. Experimental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis with submerged devices: preliminary results of a canine model. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13:224-230
11. Oda T, Sawaki Y, Fukuta K, et al. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by distraction osteogenesis under skin flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:9-13
12. Gantous A, Phillips JH, Catton P, et al. Distraction osteogenesis in the irradiated canine mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:164-168
13. Lemperle SM, Calhoun CJ, Curran RW, et al. Bony healing of large cranial and mandibular defects protected from soft-tissue interposition: A comparative study of spontaneous bone regeneration, osteoconduction, and cancellous autografting in dogs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:660-672
14. Ayoub AF, Richardson W, Barbenel JC. Mandibular elongation by automatic distraction osteogenesis: The first application in humans. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;43:324-328
15. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989;239:263-285
16. Schmelzeisen R, Neumann G, vonderFecht R. Distraction osteogenesis in the mandible with a motor-driven plate: a preliminary animal study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;34:375-378
17. Ploder O, Mayr W, Schnetz G, et al. Mandibular lengthening with an implanted motor-driven device: preliminary study in sheep. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37:273-276
18. Kessler PA, Wiltfang J, Neukam FW. A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 2000;28:5-11
19. Ayoub AF, Richardson W, Koppel D, et al. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;39:356-364
20. Kessler PA, Merten HA, Neukam FW, et al. The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:171-180
21. Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:299-308
22. Klug CN, Millesi-Schobel GA, Millesi W, et al. Preprosthetic vertical distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using an L-shaped osteotomy and titanium membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1302-1308
23. Elshahat A, Inoue N, Marti G, et al. Role of guided bone regeneration principle in preventing fibrous healing in distraction osteogenesis at high speed: experimental study in rabbit mandibles. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:916-921