Unified fitness report for the workplace

Occupational Medicine - State of the Art Reviews

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 723-737

  Colledge, Alan L ^a,c   Johns Jr , Richard E ^b  

^a Labor Commission   (United States)

^b NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

^c c/o Labor Commission State of Utah ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; FEMALE; FITNESS; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORKPLACE;

EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PHYSICAL FITNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORKPLACE;

EID: 33749118510     PISSN: 0885114X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Yelin E. Displaced concern: the social context of the work disability problem. Millbank Mem Fund Q. 1989;67(suppl 2, pt 1);114-166.
2. Leigh JP, Markowitz SB, Fahs M, Shin C, Landrigan PJ. Occupational injury and illness in the United States: estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortality (see comments). Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1557-1568.
3. State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Attending Doctor's Handbook, 1996, p4.
4. Harris L and Associates. Disabled Americans' Self Perceptions: Bringing Disabled Americans Into the Mainstream. New York:Harris&Associates; 1986
5. LaPlante MP. The demographics of disability: the Americans with disabilities act - from policy to practice. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1991;69(suppl 1, pt 2):55-57.
6. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC, §12101 (1991).
7. Nagi S. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1976;54:439-468.
8. Yuker HE. The Disability Hierarchies: Comparative Reactions to Various Types of Physical and Mental Disabilities. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University Press; 1987.
9. Berkowitz E. Disabled Policy: American's Programs for the Handicapped. New York:Cambridge University Press; 1987.
10. Stone D. The Disabled State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1984.
11. Postal L. Medical-Legal Interference: Disability Evaluation. St. Louis, MO: American Medical Association; 1996:59.
12. Panzarella, JP, The nature of work, job loss, and the diagnostic complexities of the psychologically injured worker. Psych Ann 1991:21:10-15
13. Dent GL.Curing the disabling effects of employee injury. Risk Manage. 1985; January:30.
14. Derebery VJ, Tullis WH. Delayed recovery in the patient with a work compensable injury. J Occup Med 1983;25:829-835.
15. Nachemson AL. Work for all. Clin Orthop. 1983;179:77.
16. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishono N. et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and one year follow up. Spine. 1985;10:483-493.
17. Dworkin RH, Handlin DS, Richlin DM, Brand L Vannucci C Unraveling the effects of compensation, litigation, and employment on treatment response in chronic pain. Pain. 1985;23:49-59.
18. Stung JP. The chronic disability syndrome. In: Aronoff GM, ed. Evaluation and Treatment of Chronic Pain. Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1985.
19. Walton M. The Demming Management Method. New York: Putnam; 1986.
20. Gice J. Tomokins K. Cutting costs with return to work programs. Risk Manage. 1988;35:62-65.
21. Taylor T. Working around workers' injuries. Nation's Business. 1988;76:39-40.
22. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC § 12101 (1991).
23. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC § 12101 (1991).
24. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC § 12101 (1991).
25. Equal Opportunity Commission. Cumulative ADA Charge Data, March 31, 1996. Data compiled by the Office of Program Operations from the EEOC's Charge Data System's National Data Base.
26. Bell, C, Overview of the American with disability act and the family and medical leave act, Disability Evaluation, American Medical Association , Mosby St. Louis, Mo 1996 pp.582-591
27. Americans with Disabilities Act 26.42 U.S.C. § 12113(b); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.15(b)(2).
28. The Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1993.
29. A Technical Assistance Manual on the Employment Provision (Title I) of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; 1992:Section VI-7.
30. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC § 12101 (1991).
31. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC § 12101 (1991).
32. A Technical Assistance Manual on the Employment Provision (Title I) of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; 1992:Section VI-7.
33. A Technical Assistance Manual on the Employment Provision (Title I) of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; 1992:Section VI-7.
34. Thomas MH. Work place Functional Ability Guidelines. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Medical Association; 1994.
35. Johns RE Jr, Elegante JM, Teynor PD, et al: Fitness for duty. In Demeter S (ed): Disability Evaluation. American Medical Association, Mosby St. Louis, Mo 1996 pp 592-604
36. Johns RE Jr, Bloswick DS, Elegante JM, Chronic, recurrent low back pain, a methodology or analyzing fitness for duty and managing risk under the Americans with disability act. JOM Vol 36, no 5 may 1994.
37. Colledge AL, Johns RE Jr, Thomas MH. Functional abilities assessment: Guidelines for the workplace. JOEM. 1999;vol 41, no 3, Mar 1999;172-180.
38. United States Employment Service Dictionary of Occupational Titles, 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1991:1013.
39. Diller E. Evaluating the existing system of drivers with medical conditions in Utah, Mountain injury control research center, University of Utah, 4-22-99.
40. Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC § 12101 (1991).
41. Andersson GBJ. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer JW, editor. The adult spine: principles and practice.New York: Raven Press, Ltd.;1991. p.107-46.
42. Cypress BK. Characteristics of physician visits for back symptoms: A national perspective. Am J Public Health 1983 Apr;73(4):389-95.
43. Vällfors B. Acute, subacute and chronic low back pain: Clinical symptoms, absenteeism and working environment.Scand J Rehab Med Suppl 1985;11:1-98.
44. Sternbach RA. Survey of pain in the United States: The Nuprin pain report. Clin J Pain 1986; 2(1):49-53.
45. Cunningham LS, Kelsey JL. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal impairments and associated disability. Am J Public Health 1984;74:574-9.
46. Nachemson AL. Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look. Clin Orthop 1992;279:8-20.
47. RE Johns, Bloswick DS, Elegante JM, Chronic, recurrent low back pain, a methodology or analyzing fitness for duty and managing risk under the Americans with disability act. JOM Vol 36, no 5 may 1994.
48. Glover JR. Prevention of back pain. In: Jayson M, ed. The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain, 2nd ed. Tunbridge Wells, England: Pitman Medical; 1980.
49. Taylor PJ. Personal factors associated with sickness absence. A study of 194 men with contrasting sickness absence experience in a refinery population. Br J Ind Med. 1968;25:106-118.
50. Rowe ML. Preliminary statistical study of low baek pain. J Occup Med. 1963; 5:336-341.
51. Nachemson AL. Back problems in childhood and adolescence (in Swedish). Lakartidningen 1968;65:2831-2842.
52. Troup JDG, Martin JW, Lloyd DCEF. Back pain in industry. A prospective survey.Spine. 1981;6: 61-69.
53. Pedersen PA. Prognostic indicators in low back pain. J R Coll Gen Pracr 1981; 31:209-216.
54. Suesterhaus M.P Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Functional Capacity Evaluation Study Course, Orthopedic Section, Am Physical Therapy Association, May 1998, pp 1-14.
55. King PM, Tuckwell N. Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78:852-866.
56. King PM, Tuckwell N. Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78:852-866.
57. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. The effect of compensation on recovery from low back injury. Spine 1989;14-.947-55.
58. Hunter SJ, Shaha S, Flint DF, etal. Predicting Return to work, A long term follow-up study of railroad workers after low back injuries. Spine 1998, Vol 23 No 21, pp 2319-2328.
59. Sander RA, Meyers JE. The relationship of disability to compensation status in railroad workers, Spine 1986;11:141-3
60. Guest GH, Drummond PD. E!ffect of compensation on emotional state and disability in chronic back pain. Pain 1992; 48:125-30.
61. Jamison RN, Matt DA, Parris WCV. Effects of time, limited vs. unlimited compensation on pain behavior and treatment outcome in low back pain patients. J Psychosom Res 1988;32:277-83.
62. Leavitt F. The physical exertion factor in compensable work injuries; A hidden flaw in previous research. Spine 1992;17:307-10.
63. Milhous RL, Haugh LD, Frymoyer J'W, et al. Determinants of vocational disability in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:589-93.
64. Fredrickson BE, Trief PM, Van Beveren P, Yuan HA, Baum G. Rehabilitation of the patients with chronic back pain: a search for outcome predictors. Spine 1988;3:351-3
65. Guck TP, Meilman PW, Skultery FK Dowd ET. Prediction of long-term outcome of multidisciplinary pain treatment. Ach of Phy Med and Rehabil 1986, 67 233-6.
66. Milhous RL, Haugh LD, Frymoyer J'W, et al. Determinants of vocational disability in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:589-93.
67. King PM. Analysis of approaches to detection of sincerity of effort through grip strength measurement. Work. 1998;10:9-13.
68. Robinson ME, Geisser ME, Hanson CS, O'Conner PD. Detecting submaximal efforts in grip strength testing with the coefficient of variation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 1993;3:45-50.
69. Baker JC. Burden of proof in detection of submaximal effort. WORK. 1998;10:63-70.
70. Lechner D, Bradbury SF, Bradley LA. Detecting sincerity of effort: a summary of methods and approaches. Phy Ther. 1998;78:867-888.
71. Hazard RG. Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: Variability as an indicator of effort. Spine. 1988;13:54-57.
72. The Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1993.