Innovation and growth with rich and poor consumers

Metroeconomica

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 233-262

  Zweimüller, Josef ^a,b   Brunner, Johann K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Bank of Israel   (United States)

^c JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749073990     PISSN: 00261386     EISSN: 1467999X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2005.00215.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aghion P., Bolton P. (1991): A Trickle-Down Theory of Growth and Development with Debt-Overhang, mimeo, DELTA, Paris.
2. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992): ‘A model of growth through creative destruction’, Econometrica, 60, pp. 323–51.
3. Alesina A., Rodrik D. (1994): ‘Distributive politics and economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, pp. 465–90.
4. Banerjee A. V., Newman A. F. (1993): ‘Occupational choice and the process of development’, Journal of Political Economy, 101, pp. 274–98.
5. Clarke R. (1995): ‘More evidence on income distribution and growth’, Journal of Development Economics, 47, pp. 403–27.
6. Falkinger J. (1994): ‘An Engelian model of growth and innovation with hierarchic demand and unequal incomes’, Ricerche Economiche, 48, pp. 123–39.DOI: 10.1016/0035-5054(94)90003-5
7. Gabszewicz J. J., Thisse J.-F. (1979): ‘Price competition, quality and income disparities’, Journal of Economic Theory, 20, pp. 340–59.DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(79)90041-3
8. Gabszewicz J. J., Thisse J.-F. (1980): ‘Entry (and exit) in a differentiated industry’, Journal of Economic Theory, 22, pp. 327–38.DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(80)90046-0
9. Galor O., Zeira J. (1993): ‘Income distribution and macroeconomics’, Review of Economic Studies, 60, pp. 35–52.
10. Glass A. J. (1995): Income Distribution and Quality Improvement, mimeo, Ohio State University, Columbus.
11. Grossman G. M., Helpman E. (1991): Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Li C.-W. (1996): Inequality, Market Structure and Growth: a Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective, mimeo, Oxford University, Oxford.
13. Moene K. O., Wallerstein M. (1992): The Process of Creative Destruction and the Scope of Collective Bargaining, mimeo, University of Oslo, Oslo.
14. Murphy K. M., Shleifer, A., Vishny R. (1989): ‘Income distribution, market size, and industrialization’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, pp. 537–64.
15. O'Donoghue T., Scotchmer S., Thisse J.-F. (1995) ‘Patent breadth, patent life and the pace of technological improvement’, Working Paper No. 95–242, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Perotti R. (1993): ‘Political equilibrium, income distribution, and growth’, Review of Economic Studies, 60, pp. 755–76.
17. Persson T., Tabellini G. (1994): ‘Is inequality harmful for growth?’, American Economic Review, 84, pp. 600–21.
18. Saint-Paul G., Verdier T. (1993): ‘Education, democracy and growth’, Journal of Development Economics, 42, pp. 399–407.DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(93)90027-K
19. Shaked A., Sutton J. (1982): ‘Relaxing price competition through product differentiation’, Review of Economic Studies, 49, pp. 3–13.
20. Shaked A., Sutton J. (1983): ‘Natural oligopolies’, Econometrica, 51, pp. 1469–83.
21. Torvik R. (1993): ‘Talent, growth and income distribution’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, pp. 581–96.
22. Zweimüller J. (2000): ‘Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel's law. The impact of inequality on innovation driven growth’, Journal of Economic Growth, 5, pp. 185–206.DOI: 10.1023/A:1009889321237