Animal models in urological laparoscopic training;Modelos experimentales en la cirugía laparoscópica urológica

Actas Urologicas Espanolas

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 443-450

  Uson Gargallo J ^a   Sanchez Margallo F M ^a   Diaz Guemes Martin Portugues I ^a   Loscertales Martin de Agar, B ^a   Soria Galvez F ^a   Pascual Sanchez Gijon S ^b  

^a JESÚS USÓN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY CENTRE   (Spain)

^b Hospital General de Santa María del Puerto   (Spain)

Author keywords

Experimental models; Laparoscopy; Learning; Urology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; EDUCATION; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

ANIMALS; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANIMAL; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 33749073453     PISSN: 02104806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0210-4806(06)73478-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Stolzenburg JU, Schwaibold H, Bhanot SM, Rabenalt R, Do M, Truss M, et al. Modular surgical training for endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96(7): 1022-1027.
2. Usón J, Pascual S, Sánchez FM, Hernández FJ. Pautas para el aprendizaje en suturas laparoscópicas. En: Usón J, Pascual S (eds.), Aprendizaje en suturas laparoscópicas, Libreria General S.A., Zaragoza, capítulo 2. 1999;38-54.
3. Usón J, Pascual S, Sánchez FM. Aprendizaje y formación en cirugía laparoscópica. En: Bilbao E, Pascual S. Cirugía laparoscópica del Reflujo Gastroesofáfico. Técnica de Nissen. Editorial Centro de Cirugía de Minima Invasión. Cáceres. 2002: 37-61.
4. Usón J, Pascual S, Sánchez FM, Tejonero MC. Enseñanza de la laparoscopia: Bases prácticas. En: Usón J. Sánchez FM, Roca A, Passas J, Van Velthoven R. Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica. Editorial Centro de Cirugía de Minima Invasión. Cáceres. 2003; 97-124.
5. Bannenberg J, Meijer D. Setting up and Running Courses. En: Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF, Modlin IM (ed). Laparoscopic surgery. Section VIII: Postdoctoral training for laparoscopic surgery. Chapter 61. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia. 1994; 677-685.
6. Shalhav AL, Dabagia MD, Wagner TT, Koch MO, Lingeman JE. Training postgraduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: the current challenge. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2135-2137.
7. D'Amico TA, Schwartz LB, Eubanks S. Laparoscopic instrumentation and basic techniques. In: Pappas TN, Schwartz LB, Eubanks S (eds). Atlas of laparoscopic surgery. Chapter 1. Current Medicine. Philadelphia. 1-10. 1996.
8. Guidelines for granting of privileges for laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic general surgery. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc. 1998;12(4):379-380.
9. Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF. Accreditation council on graduate medical education technical skills competency compliance: urologic surgical skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(3):454-457.
10. Masero V, Sánchez FM, Usón J. An integrated system of telemedicine for minimally invasive surgery. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6 Suppl 2:S88-S89.
11. Masero V, Sánchez FM, Usón J. A telemedicine system for enabling teaching activities. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6 Suppl 2:S86-S88.
12. Laguna M, Pilar A, Hatzinger M, Rassweiler J. Simulators and endourological training. Current Opinion in Urology. 2002;12(3):209-215.
13. Usón J, Sánchez FM. El futuro de la cirugía de mínima invasión. Cirugía Mayor Ambulatoria. 1998; 3(4):14-18.
14. Shah J, Mackay S, Vale J, Darzi A. Simulation in urology - a role for virtual reality?. BJU Int. 2001;88(7): 661-665.
15. Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McGlade K, McClure N. A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition. Am J Surg. 2000;180:208-211.
16. Traxer O, Gettman MT, Napper CA, Scott DJ, Jones DB, Roehrborn CG, Pearle MS et al. The impact of intense laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urology residents. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1658-1661.
17. Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH. Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1077-1082.
18. Berguer R. Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(5):458-452.
19. Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD. Ergonomics problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13(5):466-468.
20. Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol. 2001:15(5):499-503.
21. Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J. A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(2):139-142.
22. Pereira-Sampaio MA, Favorito LA, Sampaio FJ. Pig kidney: anatomical relationship between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. Applied study for urological research and surgical training. J Urol. 2004;172(5 Pt 1): 2077-2081.
23. Pareek G, Hedican SP, Bishoff JT, Shichman SJ, Wolf JS, Nakada SY. Survey from skills-based hands on learning courses demonstrates increased laparoscopic caseload and clinical laparoscopic suturing. Urology. 2005;66(2): 271-273.
24. Gupta R, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Feedback from operative performance to improve training program of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2004:18 (9):836-839.
25. Laguna MP, Schreuders LC, Rassweiler JJ, Abbou CC, van Velthoven R, Janetschek G, et al. Development of laparoscopic surgery and training facilities in Europe: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol. 2005;47(3):346-351.
26. Katz R, Hoznek A., Antiphon P, Van Velthoven R, Delmas V, Abbou CC. Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training. Urol Int. 2003;71(3):310-315.
27. Thiel W. Supplement to the conservation of an entire cadaver according to W. Thiel. Ann Anat. 2002;84(3):267-269.