Empirical results from an experiment on Value-Based Review (VBR) processes

2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, ISESE 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-12

  Lee, Keun ^a   Boehm, Barry ^a  

^a University of Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST BASED READING (CBR); E-SERVICES; VALUE BASED REVIEW (VBR); VERIFICATION;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SPECIFICATIONS; VALUE ENGINEERING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33749072887     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISESE.2005.1541809     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Boehm, B and Basili, V. Software Defect Reduction Top 10 List, Computer. January 2001, pp.135-137.
2. Pagan, M., Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development, IBM Sys. J IS(3), 1976, pp. 182-211
3. Gilb, T and Graham, D 1993. Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
4. Shull, F., Basili, V., Zelkowitz, M., Boehm, B., Brown, A, W., Port, D., Rus, I., and Tesoreiro, R., What we have learned about fighting defects, Proc. Intl. Conf. SW Metrics. June 2002.
5. Aurum, A., Petersson, H., and Wohlin, C., State-of-the Art:_software inspections after 25 years, Software Testing. Verification, and Reliability. Vol. 12, 2002, pp. 133-154.
6. A.Porter, L. Votta, and V.Basili, Comparing Detection Methods for software Requirement Inspection: a Replicated Experiment, IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol 21, no 6, pp. 563-575, June 1995.
7. Abdebabi, Z. Cantone, E., Ciolkowski, M., and Rombach, D., Comparing code reading techniques applied to object-oriented software frameworks with regard to effectiveness and defect detection rate, Proc. ISESE 2004. pp 239-248.
8. Basili, V., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sorumgard, S., and Zelkowitz, M. The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading, Intl. J. Empirical SW. Engr., 1(2) 1996, pp.133-164.
9. Conradi, R,. and Wang, A. (eds.), Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering: Experiences from ESERNET. Springer Verlag, 2003.
10. Thelin, T., Runeson, P., and Wohlin, C., Prioritized use cases as a vehicle for software inspections, Software, July/Aug 2003, pp. 30-33.
11. Denger, C., Ciolkowski, M., and Lanubile, F., Investing the active guidance factor in reading techniques for defect detection, Proc., ISESE 2004. pp. 219-228.
12. Berling, T., and Thelin, T., A case study of reading techniques in a software company. Proc., ISESE 2004. pp. 229-238.
13. Lee, K., Phongpaibul, M., and Boehm, B., Value-based verification and validation guidelines, Technical Report USC-CSE-2005-502, February 2005.
14. Boehm, B., Egyed, A., Kwan, J., Port, D., Shah, A., and Madachy, R., Using the WinWin Spiral Model: A Case Study, Computer. July 1998, pp. 33-44.
15. Boehm, B., Port, D., Abi-Antoun, M., and Egyed, A., Guidelines for the Life Cycle Objectives (LCO) and the Life Cycle Architecture (LCA) deliverables for Model-Based Architecting and Software Engineering (MBASE), USC Technical Report USC-CSE-98-519, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, February 1999.
16. Aurum, A., Biffl, S., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H. and Gruenbacher, P. (eds.), Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer Verlag, 2005 (to appear)