Acceptance issues in metrics program implementation

Proceedings - International Software Metrics Symposium

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 10-20

  Umarji, Medha ^a   Emurian, Henry ^a  

^a Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FAILURE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

FAILURE RATE; METRICS PROGRAMS; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PSYCHOLOGY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 33749069899     PISSN: 15301435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/METRICS.2005.6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. I. Ajzen, "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991.
2. I. Ajzen, "Perceived Behavioral, Self-efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 665-683, 2002.
3. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change," Psychological Review, Vol. 84, pp. 191-215, 1977.
4. L.C. Briand, C.M. Differding, and H.D. Rombach, "Practical Guidelines for Measurement-Based Process Improvement," Software Process - Improvement and Practice, vol. 2. pp. 253-280, 1996.
5. F. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and End User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, pp. 318-339, 1989.
6. M. Dasakalantonakis, "A Practical View of Software Measurement and Implementation Experiences within Motorola," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 18, pp. 998-1010, November 1992.
7. A. Gopal, M.S. Krishnan, T. Mukhopadhyay and D. oldenson, "Measurement Programs in Software Development: Determinants of Success," IEEE Trans. on Software Eng., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 863-875, September 2002.
8. T. Hall and N. Fenton, "Implementing Effective Software Metrics Programs," IEEE Software (March/April). Pp. 55-65, 1997.
9. B. Hardgrave and R. Johnson, "Toward an Information Systems Development Acceptance Model: The Case of Object-Oriented Systems Development," IEEE Trans. On Eng. Management, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 322-336 August 2003.
10. J. Iversen and L. Mathiassen, "Lessons from Implementing a Software Metrics Program," Proc. Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences (HICSS-33), 2000.
11. D.R. Jeffery and M. Berry, "A Framework for Evaluation and Prediction of Metrics Program Success," Proc. 1st Int'l Software Metrics Symp, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.,1993, pp. 28-39.
12. D.R. Jeffery, V. Basili and M. Berry, "Establishing Successful Measurement for Software Quality Improvement," Proc. TC8AUS IFIP Int'l Working Conf., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 339-350.
13. K. Mathieson, "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, pp. 173-191, 1991.
14. G. Moore and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, vol. 2, pp. 192-222, 1991.
15. F. Niessink and H. van Vilet, "Towards Mature Measurement Programs," Proc. Second Euromicro Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 82-88, Florence, Italy, March 8-11, 1998, IEEE Computer Society.
16. R.J. Offen and R. Jeffrey, "Establishing Software Measurement Programs," IEEE Software, pp. 45-53, Mar./Apr. 1997.
17. W. J. Orlikowski, "CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development," MIS Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 309-340, 1993.
18. D. Paulish and A. Carleton, "Case Studies of Software Process Improvement Measurement," IEEE Computer, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 50-57, September 1994.
19. S. L. Pfleeger, "Lessons Learned in Building a Corporate Metrics Program," IEEE Software, pp. 67-74, May 1993.
20. S.L. Pfleeger, "Understanding and Improving Technology Transfer in Software Engineering," J. Systems and Software, vol. 47, nos. 2-3, pp. 111-124, July 1999.
21. C. Reimenschneider, B. Hardgrave and F. D. Davis, "Explaining Software Practitioner Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models," IEEE Trans. on Software Eng., vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1135-1145, December 2002.
22. R. Rhodes and K. Courneya, "Investigating Multiple Components of Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Control: An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Exercise Domain," British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 42, pp. 129-146, 2003.
23. H. Rubin, "Measuring 'Rigor' and Putting Measurement into Action," American Programmer, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 9-23, September 1991.
24. V. Venkatesh and F. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Manage. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000.