Chapter 17 Judging emotion and attitudes from prosody following brain damage

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 156, Issue , 2006, Pages 303-317

  Pell, Marc D ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

attitudes; brain damaged; communication disorders; emotion; interpersonal behavior; pragmatic language processing; prosody; right hemisphere

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DISEASE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

BRAIN DISEASES; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EXPRESSED EMOTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33749062760     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56017-0     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Adolphs R., Damasio H., and Tranel D. Neural systems for recognition of emotional prosody: a 3-D lesion study. Emotion 2 (2002) 23-51
2. Barr D.J. Paralinguistic correlates of conceptual structure. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 10 (2003) 462-467
3. Baum S.R., and Pell M.D. The neural bases of prosody: insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. Aphasiology 13 (1999) 581-608
4. Blum-Kulka S. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?. J. Prag. 11 (1987) 131-146
5. Blanc J.-M., and Dominey P. Identification of prosodic attitudes by a temporal recurrent network. Cogn. Brain Res. 17 (2003) 693-699
6. Boltz M.G. Temporal dimensions of conversational interaction: the role of response latencies and pauses in social impression formation. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 24 (2005) 103-138
7. Bowers D., Coslett H.B., Bauer R.M., Speedie L.J., and Heilman K.M. Comprehension of emotional prosody following unilateral hemispheric lesions: processing defect versus distraction defect. Neuropsychologia 25 (1987) 317-328
8. Breitenstein C., Daum I., and Ackermann H. Emotional processing following cortical and subcortical brain damage: contribution of the fronto-striatal circuitry. Behav. Neurol. 11 (1998) 29-42
9. Brennan S.E., and Williams M. The feeling of another's knowing: prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. J. Mem. Lang. 34 (1995) 383-398
10. Brown P., and Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. Brownell H.H., Carroll J.J., Rehak A., and Wingfield A. The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang. 43 (1992) 121-147
12. Brownell H., Pincus D., Blum A., Rehak A., and Winner E. The effects of right-hemisphere brain damage on patients' use of terms of personal reference. Brain Lang. 57 (1997) 60-79
13. Brown B.L., Strong W.J., and Rencher A.C. Fifty-four voices from two: the effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55 (1974) 313-318
14. Burgoon J.K. Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 12 (1993) 30-48
15. Caffi C., and Janney R.W. Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. J. Prag. 22 (1994) 325-373
16. Cancelliere A.E.B., and Kertesz A. Lesion localization in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension. Brain Cogn 13 (1990) 133-147
17. Charbonneau S., Scherzer B.P., Aspirot D., and Cohen H. Perception and production of facial and prosodic emotions by chronic CVA patients. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 605-613
18. Cheang H.S., and Pell M.D. A study of humour and communicative intention following right hemisphere stroke. J. Clin. Linguist. Phonet. 20 (2006) 447-462
19. Clark H.H., and Schunk D. Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition 8 (1980) 111-143
20. Culpeper J., Bousfield D., and Wichmann A. Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. J. Prag. 35 (2003) 1545-1579
21. Foldi N.S. Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang. 31 (1987) 88-108
22. Friederici A., and Alter K. Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dynamic dual pathway model. Brain Lang. 89 (2004) 267-276
23. Gandour J., Tong Y., Wong D., Talavage T., Dzemidzic M., Xu Y., Li X., and Lowe M. Hemispheric roles in the perception of speech prosody. NeuroImage 23 (2004) 344-357
24. Gandour J., Wong D., Dzemidzic M., Lowe M., Tong Y., and Li X. A cross-linguistic fMRI study of perception of intonation and emotion in Chinese. Hum. Brain Mapp. 18 (2003) 149-157
25. Happe F., Brownell H., and Winner E. Acquired theory of mind impairments following stroke. Cognition 70 (1999) 211-240
26. Hesling I., Clement S., Bordessoules M., and Allard M. Cerebral mechanisms of prosodic integration: evidence from connected speech. NeuroImage 24 (2005) 937-947
27. Hirst W., Ledous J., and Stein S. Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: evidence from aphasiology. Brain Lang. 23 (1984) 26-33
28. Holmes J. Modifying illocutionary force. J. Prag. 8 (1984) 345-365
29. Hsieh L., Gandour J., Wong D., and Hutchins G. Functional heterogeneity of inferior frontal gyrus is shaped by linguistic experience. Brain Lang. 76 (2001) 227-252
30. Kimble C.E., and Seidel S. Vocal signs of confidence. J. Nonver. Behav. 15 (1991) 99-105
31. Kotz S., Meyer M., Alter K., Besson M., Von Cramon Y., and Friederici A. On the lateralization of emotional prosody: an event-related functional MR investigation. Brain Lang. 86 (2003) 366-376
32. Ladd D.R., Silverman K.E.A., Tolkmitt F., Bergmann G., and Scherer K.R. Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and Fo range in signaling speaker affect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78 (1985) 435-444
33. Laplante D., and Ambady N. On how things are said: voice tone, voice intensity, verbal content and perceptions of politeness. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 22 (2003) 434-441
34. Loveday L. Pitch, politeness and sexual role: an exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Lang. Speech 24 (1981) 71-89
35. Martin I., and McDonald S. Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain Lang. 85 (2003) 451-466
36. Mitchell R.L.C., Elliott R., Barry M., Cruttenden A., and Woodruff P.W.R. The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1410-1421
37. Pakosz M. Attitudinal judgments in intonation: some evidence for a theory. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 12 (1983) 311-326
38. Pell M.D. Recognition of prosody following unilateral brain lesion: influence of functional and structural attributes of prosodic contours. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 701-715
39. Pell M.D. Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1668-1680
40. Pell M.D. Prosody-face interactions in emotional processing as revealed by the facial affect decision task. J. Nonver. Behav. 29 (2005) 193-215
41. Pell M.D. Cerebral mechanisms for understanding emotional prosody in speech. Brain Lang. 96 (2006) 221-234
42. Pell, M.D. Reduced sensitivity to "prosodic attitudes" in adults with focal right hemisphere brain damage. Brain Lang., in press.
43. Pell M.D., and Baum S.R. The ability to perceive and comprehend intonation in linguistic and affective contexts by brain-damaged adults. Brain Lang. 57 (1997) 80-99
44. Pell M.D., and Leonard C.L. Processing emotional tone from speech in Parkinson's disease: a role for the basal ganglia. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3 (2003) 275-288
45. Plante E., Creusere M., and Sabin C. Dissociating sentential prosody from sentence processing: activation interacts with task demands. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 401-410
46. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Commun. 41 (2003) 245-255
47. Ross E.D., Thompson R.D., and Yenkosky J. Lateralization of affective prosody in brain and the collosal integration of hemispheric language functions. Brain Lang. 56 (1997) 27-54
48. Scherer K.R., Ladd D.R., and Silverman K. Vocal cues to speaker affect: testing two models. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76 (1984) 1346-1356
49. Scherer K.R., London H., and Wolf J.J. The voice of confidence: paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. J. Res. Person. 7 (1973) 31-44
50. Schirmer A., Zysset S., Kotz S., and Von Cramon D.Y. Gender differences in the activation of inferior frontal cortex during emotional speech perception. NeuroImage 21 (2004) 1114-1123
51. Sidtis J., and Van Lancker Sidtis D. A neurobehavioral approach to dysprosody. Semin. Speech Lang. 24 (2003) 93-105
52. Smith V.L., and Clark H.H. On the course of answering questions. J. Mem. Lang. 32 (1993) 25-38
53. Starkstein S.E., Federoff J.P., Price T.R., Leiguarda R.C., and Robinson R.G. Neuropsychological and neuroradiologic correlates of emotional prosody comprehension. Neurology 44 (1994) 515-522
54. Stemmer B., Giroux F., and Joanette Y. Production and evaluation of requests by right-hemisphere brain-damaged individuals. Brain Lang. 47 (1994) 1-31
55. Tompkins C.A., and Mateer C.A. Right hemisphere appreciation of prosodic and linguistic indications of implicit attitude. Brain Lang. 24 (1985) 185-203
56. Tong Y., Gandour J., Talavage T., Wong D., Dzemidzic M., Xu Y., Li X., and Lowe M. eural circuitry underlying sentence-level linguistic prosody. NeuroImage 28 (2005) 417-428
57. Trees A.R., and Manusov V. Managing face concerns in criticism: integrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Hum. Commun. Res. 24 (1998) 564-583
58. Uldall E. Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Lang. Speech 3 (1960) 223-234
59. Van Lancker D. Cerebral lateralization of pitch cues in the linguistic signal. Pap. Linguist. 13 (1980) 201-277
60. Van Lancker D., and Sidtis J.J. The identification of affective-prosodic stimuli by left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects: all errors are not created equal. J. Speech Hearing Res. 35 (1992) 963-970
61. Vingerhoets G., Berckmoes, and Stroobant N. Cerebral hemodynamics during discrimination of prosodic and semantic emotion in speech studied by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Neuropsychology 17 (2003) 93-99
62. Weylman S., Brownell H., Roman M., and Gardner H. Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: the effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain Lang. 36 (1989) 580-591
63. Wichmann, A. (2002) Attitudinal intonation and the inferential process. In: Bel, B., Marlien, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, 11-13 April 2002. Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-en-Provence, France.
64. Wildgruber D., Hertrich I., Riecker A., Erb M., Anders S., Grodd W., and Ackermann H. Distinct frontal regions subserve evaluation of linguistic and emotional aspects of speech intonation. Cerebral Cortex 14 (2004) 1384-1389
65. Wildgruber D., Pihan H., Ackermann H., Erb M., and Grodd W. Dynamic brain activation during processing of emotional intonation: influence of acoustic parameters, emotional valence, and sex. NeuroImage 15 (2002) 856-869