Age-related deficits in guided search using cues

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 526-534

  Gottlob, Lawrence R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Guided search; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR BLINDNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 33749036859     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.526     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bojko, A., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2004). Age equivalence in switch costs for prosaccade and antisaccade tasks. Psychology and Aging, 19, 226-234.
2. Cerella, J., Poon, L. W., & Fozard, J. L. (1982). Age and iconic read-out. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 197-202.
3. Cerella, J., Poon, L. W., & Williams, D. M. (1980). Age and the complexity hypothesis. In L. W. Poon & M. Albert (Eds.), Aging in the 1980s: Psychological issues (pp. 332-340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Dennis, W., Scialfa, C. T., & Ho, G. (2004). Age differences in feature selection in triple conjunction search. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P277-P287.
5. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39.
6. Gottlob, L. R., & Madden, D. J. (1998). Time course of allocation of visual attention after equating for sensory differences: An age-related perspective. Psychology and Aging, 13, 138-149.
7. Ho, G., & Scialfa, C. T. (2002). Age, skill transfer, and conjunction search. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P277-P287.
8. Humphrey, D. G., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets. Psychology and Aging, 12, 704-717.
9. Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Gopher, D. (1999). Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 101, 339-378.
10. Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126-147.
11. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
12. Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition, 6, 312-319.
13. Madden, D. J., Gottlob, L. R., & Allen, P. A. (1999). Adult age differences in visual search accuracy: Attentional guidance and target detectability. Psychology and Aging, 14, 683-694.
14. Madden, D. J., Whiting, W. L., Cabeza, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2004). Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 19, 304-309.
15. Plude, D. J., & Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A. (1989). Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. Psychology and Aging, 4, 98-105.
16. Scialfa, C. T., Jenkins, L., Hamaluk, E., & Skaloud, P. (2000). Aging and the development of automaticity in conjunction search. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55B, P27-P46.
17. Scialfa, C. T., McPhee, L., & Ho, G. (2004). Varied-mapping conjunction search: Evidence for rule-based learning. Spatial Vision, 17, 543-558.
18. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
19. Whiting, W. L., Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., & Allen, P. A. (2005). Searching from the top down: Ageing and attentional guidance during singleton detection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68A, 72-97.
20. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
21. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44, 1411-1426.