Conservative chaotic map as a model of quantum many-body environment

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Rossini, Davide ^a   Benenti, Giuliano ^b,c   Casati, Giulio ^b,c,d  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^c INFN SEZIONE DI MILANO   (Italy)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; CONFORMAL MAPPING; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

CHAOTIC MAP; DECOHERENCE; DYNAMICAL SYSTEM; QUANTUM KICKED ROTATOR MODEL;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 33749028171     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036209     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715 75, 715 (2003).
2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
3. G. Benenti, G. Casati, and G. Strini, Principles of Quantum Computation and Information, Basic Concepts (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004), Vol. I.
4. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Ann. Phys. ANPYA2 0003-3804 10.1016/0003-4916(83)90202-6 149, 374 (1983).
5. H.-K. Park and S. W. Kim, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.060102 67, 060102 (R) (2003).
6. R. Blume-Kohout and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032104 68, 032104 (2003).
7. J. W. Lee, D. V. Averin, G. Benenti, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012310 72, 012310 (2005).
8. L. Ermann, J. P. Paz, and M. Saraceno, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012302 73, 012302 (2006).
9. C. Pineda and T. H. Seligman, e-print quant-ph/0605169.
10. G. M. Palma, K.-A. Suominen, and A. K. Ekert, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A PRLAAZ 1364-5021 452, 567 (1996).
11. G. Ithier, E. Collin, P. Joyez, P. J. Meeson, D. Vion, D. Esteve, F. Chiarello, A. Shnirman, Y. Makhlin, J. Schriefl, and G. SchÃn, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.134519 72, 134519 (2005).
12. S. Daffer, K. Wódkiewicz, J. D. Cresser, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.010304 70, 010304 (R) (2004).
13. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245 80, 2245 (1998).
14. D. Braun, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89. 277901 89, 277901 (2002).
15. Note that the entanglement decay cannot be exponential at long times. Indeed we have E12 =0 after a finite time (see Fig. 1), since the set of separable two-qubit mixed states possesses a nonzero volume [see K. Åyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.883 58, 883 (1998)], and I 12 enters this volume in a finite time.
16. H. J. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
17. T. A. Brun, Am. J. Phys. AJPIAS 0002-9505 10.1119/1.1475328 70, 719 (2002).
18. G. G. Carlo, G. Benenti, and G. Casati, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.257903 91, 257903 (2003);
19. G. G. Carlo, G. Benenti, G. Casati, and C. Meja-Monasterio, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062317 69, 062317 (2004).
20. A. B. Rechester and R. B. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1586 44, 1586 (1980);
21. A. B. Rechester, M. N. Rosenbluth, and R. B. White, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.23.2664 23, 2664 (1981).
22. G. Benenti, G. Casati, S. Montangero, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.227901 87, 227901 (2001).
23. C. Liverani and M. Martens, Commun. Math. Phys. CMPHAY 0010-3616 260, 527 (2005);
24. R. Artuso and A. Prampolini, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00542-8 246, 407 (1998).