Assessment of violence in intimate relationships by means of the Conflict Tactics Scales: Factor structure and gender differences in youngsters;Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja mediante Las Escalas de Tácticas para conflictos: Estructura factorial y diferencias de género en jóvenes

Psicologia Conductual

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 215-233

  Corral, Susana ^a   Calvete, Esther ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Physical assault; Psychological aggression; Sexual coercion; Violence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSAULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PREVALENCE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEXUAL ABUSE; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VIOLENCE;

EID: 33749026969     PISSN: 11329483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Review, 126, 651-680.
2. Arias, I., Samios, M. y O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 82-90.
3. Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y. y Thelan, R. E. (1997). Gender differences in attribution of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3, 462-481.
4. Belknap, J. y Melton, H. (2005). Are heterosexual men also victims of intimate partner abuse? Recuperado en Julio, 2005, de la National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women página web http://www.vawnet.org.
5. Bernard, M. L. y Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships. Family Relations, 32(2), 283-286.
6. Berns, N. (2000). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame - Political discourse on women and violence. Gender & Society, 15, 262-281.
7. Byrne, B. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. a ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cross, S. E. y Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
10. Currie, D. H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts? En R. K. Bergen (dir.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Deal, J. E. y Wampler, K. S. (1986). Dating violence: The primacy of previous experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 457-471.
12. Desai, S. y Saltzman, L. E. (2002). Measurement issues for violence against women. En C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson y R. K. Bergen (dirs.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 35-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Cavanagh, K. y Lewis, R. (1998). Separate and intersecting realities: A comparison of men's and women's accounts of violence against women. Violence Against Women, 4, 382-414.
14. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M. y Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
15. Dutton, D. G. (1988). The domestic assault of women. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Foo, L. y Margolin, C. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Violence. 10, 351-377.
17. Gray, H. M. y Foshee, V. (1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 12, 126-141.
18. Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D. y Tolin, D. F. (1997). An empirical classification of motivations for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 3, 401-423.
19. Hoyle, R. H. y Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. En R. H. Hoyle (dir.), Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Londres: Sage publications.
20. Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
21. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
22. nd edition). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
23. Kasian, M. y Painter, S. (1992). Frequency and severity psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350-364.
24. Lucente, S. W., Fals-Stewart, W., Richards, H. J. y Goscha, J. I. (2001). Factor structure and reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scale for incarcerated female substance abusers. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 437-450.
25. MacCallum, R. y Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research 32, 193-210.
26. Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97-102.
27. Marcotte, D., Alain, M. y Gosselin, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in adolescent depression: Gender-typed characteristics or problem-solving skills deficits? Sex Roles, 41, 31-48.
28. Moraes, C. L. y Reichenheim, M. E. (2002). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) Portuguese version used to identify violence within couples. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 18, 783-796.
29. Murphy, C. M. (1988). Date abuse and forced intercourse among college students. En G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick y M. A. Straus (dirs.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 285-296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Newton, R. R., Connely, C. D. y Landverk, J. A. (2001). An examination of measurement characteristics and factorial validity of scores on the revised conflict tactics scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 317-335.
31. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. y Girgus, J. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424-443.
32. Pedersen, P. y Thomas, C. D. (1992). Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a Canadian university sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24, 490-501.
33. Prinstein, M. J. y Aikins, J. W. (2004). Cognitive moderators of the longitudinal association between peer rejection and adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 147-158.
34. Ramírez, I. L. (2002). Prevalence and chronicity of dating partner violence among a sample of Mexican male and female university students. Recuperado en Enero, 2004, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory pagina web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
35. Regan, K. V., Bartholomew, K., Trinke, S. J. y Henderson, A. J. Z. (2006). The relative severity of acts of physical violence in heterosexual relationships: An items response theory analysis. Personal Relationships, 13, 37-52.
36. Riggs, D. S. (1993). Relation problems and dating aggression: A potential treatment target. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 18-35.
37. Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D. y Breslin, F. C. (1990). Multiple correlates of physical aggression in dating couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 61-73.
38. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
39. Sharpe, D. y Taylor, J. K. (1999). An examination of variables from a social-developmental model to explain physical and psychological dating violence. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 31, 165-175.
40. Stets, J. E. (1991). Psychological aggression in dating relationships: The role of interpersonal control. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 97-114.
41. Stets, J. E. y Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Patterns of physical and sexual abuse for men and women in dating relationships: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 63-76.
42. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 75-88.
43. Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. En M. A. Straus y R. J. Gelles (dirs.). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
44. Straus, M. A. (2001a). Scoring and norms for the CTS2 and CTSPC. Recuperado en enero 2004, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory página web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
45. Straus, M. A. (2001b). SPSS syntax to score the CTS2. Obtenido en Enero, 2004, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory página web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
46. Straus, M. A. (2002). Length of the CTS2 compared to the original CTS. Obtenido en Enero, 2004, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory página web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
47. Straus, M. A. (2003). Sex, violence, politics, and the CTS. Obtenido en Enero, 2004, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory página web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
48. Straus, M. A. (2004a). Bibliography and tabular summary of publications on the revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2 and CTSPC). Obtenido en Enero, 2005, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory página web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
49. Straus, M. A. (2004b). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of the revised conflict tactics scales: a study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 407-432.
50. Straus, M. A. (2004c). Scoring the CTS2 and CTSPC. Recuperado en enero 2005, de la Universidad de New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory página web http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2.
51. Straus, M. A. (2004d). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790-811.
52. Straus, M. A. y Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
53. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S. y Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
54. Tuomi Jones, T., Peter, J. I. N., Beck, M. y Beck, N. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) in a female incarcerated population. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 441-457.
55. Ystgaard, M., Tambs, K. y Dalgard, O. S. (1999). Life stress, social support and psychological distress in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 12-19.