Testing the information set perspective of UK financial reporting standard no. 3: Reporting financial performance

Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

Volumn 33, Issue 7-8, 2006, Pages 1110-1141

  Lin, Stephen ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

FRS3; Information set perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749019706     PISSN: 0306686X     EISSN: 14685957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00595.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abarbanell, J. and B. Bushee (1998), 'Abnormal Return to a Fundamental Analysis Strategy', The Accounting Review, Vol. 73, pp. 19-45.
2. Accountancy (1992a), 'Good Bye to Single Performance Indicators' (December), p. 116.
3. _ (1992b), 'The Changing Face of Accounts' (January), p. 10.
4. _ (1993a), 'FKS3 Will Be 'Confusing' (December), p. 12.
5. _ (1993b), 'Happy Ending for Addicted Analysts' (October), p. 11.
6. Accounting Standard Board (1992), Financial Reporting Standard No. 3: Reporting Financial Performance (October).
7. _ (2001), Exposure Draft 22: Financial Reporting Standard No. 3: Reporting Financial Performance.
8. Beaver, W. (1989), Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution (Prentice Hall).
9. 2 in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance Over the Last Four Decades', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 83-115.
10. Cheng, C., J. Cheung and V. Gopalakrishnan (1993), 'On the Usefulness of Operating Income, Net Income and Comprehensive Income in Explaining Security Returns', Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 23, No. 91, pp. 195-203.
11. Chopping, D. and L. Skerratt (1992), Applying GAAP 1991/1992ICAEW).
12. _ _ (1994), Applying GAAP 1993/1994 (2nd ed., ICAEW).
13. Company Reporting (1997), 'Earnings per Share', No. 85, p. 4.
14. Dhaliwal, D., K. Subramanyam and R. Trezevant (1999), 'Is Comprehensive Income Superior to Net Income as a Measure of Firm Performance?', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 43-67.
15. Davies, M., R. Paterson and A. Wilson (1992), UK GAAP (3rd ed., Ernst & Young).
16. Easton, P. (1999), 'Security Returns and Value Relevance of Accounting Data', Accounting Horizons, Vol. 3 (December), pp. 399-412.
17. _ and T. Harris (1991), 'Earnings as an Explanatory Variable for Returns', Journal of Accounting Research (Spring) pp. 19-36.
18. Lin, S. (2002), 'The Association between Analyst's Forecast Revisions and Earnings Components: The Evidence of FRS 3', British Accounting Review, Vol. 34, pp. 1-26.
19. _ and M. Walker (2000), 'FRS3 Earnings, Headline Earnings, and Accounting-Based Valuation Model', Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 30, pp. 299-306.
20. Lipe, R. (1986), 'The Information Contained in the Components of Earnings', Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24 (Supplement), pp. 37-68.
21. O'Hanlon, J. and P. Pope (2000), 'The Value Relevance of UK Dirty Surplus Accounting Flows', British Accounting Review, pp. 459-82.
22. Raedy, J. (2000), 'A Reconciliation of Stock Market Anomalies', Working Paper (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill).
23. Rayburn, J. (1986), 'The Association of Operating Cash Flow and Accruals with Security Returns', Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24 Supplement), pp. 112-37.
24. Strong, N. and M. Walker (1993), 'The Explanatory Power of Earnings for Stock Returns', The Accounting Review, Vol. 68, pp. 385-99.
25. Wild, J. (1992), 'Stock Price Informativeness of Accounting Numbers: Evidence on Earnings, Book Values, and Their Components', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 119-54.
26. Wilson, G. (1986), 'The Relative Information Content of Accruals and Cash Flows: Combined Evidence at the Earnings Announcement and Annual Report Release Date', Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24 (Supplement), pp. 165-200.