How a return to theory could help alliance research

Psychotherapy

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 292-299

  Hatcher, Robert L ^a   Barends, Alex W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Alliance; Alliance theory; Psychotherapy research

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; THEORY-PRACTICE RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33749011166     PISSN: 00333204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.292     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. AGNEW-DAVIES, R., STILES, W. B., HARDY, G. E., BARKHAM, M., & SHAPIRO, D. A. (1998). Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 155-172.
2. BARBER, J. P., CONNOLLY, M., CRITS-CRISTOPH, P., GLADIS, L., & SIQUELAND, L. (2000). Alliance predicts patients' outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1027-1032.
3. BECK, J. S. (2005). Cognitive therapy for challenging problems: What to do when the basics don't work. New York: Guilford Press.
4. BEDI, R. P., DAVIS, M. D., & WILLIAMS, M. (2005). Critical incidents in the formation of the therapeutic alliance from the client's perspective. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 311-323.
5. BORDIN, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252-260.
6. BORDIN, E. S. (1980, June). Of human bonds that bind or free. Presidential address to 10th annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Pacific Grove, California.
7. BORDIN, E. S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 13-37). New York: Wiley.
8. BROTMAN, M. A. (2004). Therapeutic alliance and adherence in cognitive therapy for depression. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(3146), 6B. (UMI No. 3169565)
9. CONSTANTINO, M. J., CASTONGUAY, L. G., & SCHUT, A. J. (2002). The working alliance: A flagship for the "scientist-practitioner" model in psychotherapy. In G. S. Tryon (Ed.), Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know (pp. 81-131). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. DERUBEIS, R. J., BROTMAN, M. A., & GIBBONS, C. J. (2005). A conceptual and methodological analysis of the nonspecifics argument. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 174-183.
11. FEELY, M., DERUBEIS, R. J., & GELFAND, L. A. (1999). The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 578-582.
12. GASTON, L., & MARMAR, C. (1994). The California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 85-108). New York: Wiley.
13. HARTLEY, D. E., & STRUPP, H. H. (1983). The therapeutic alliance: Its relationship to outcome in brief psychotherapy. In J. Masling (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytical theories (Vol. l, pp. 1-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. HATCHER, R. L., & BARENDS, A. W. (1996). Patients' view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1326-1336.
15. HENRY, W. P., & STRUPP, H. H. (1994). The therapeutic alliance as interpersonal process. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 51-84). New York: Wiley.
16. HORVATH, A. O., & BEDI, R. P. (2002). The alliance. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 37-69). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. HORVATH, A. O., & GREENBERG, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223-233.
18. HOWARD, K. I., LUEGER, R. J., MALING, M. S., & MARTINOVICH, Z. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 678-685.
19. KAZDIN, A. E. (2005). Treatment outcomes, common factors, and continued neglect of mechanisms of change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 184-188.
20. MARTIN, D. J., GARSKE, J. P., & DAVIS, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.
21. NORCROSS, J. C. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work. New York: Guilford Press.
22. SALVIO, A.-M., BEUTLER, L. E., WOOD, J. M., & ENGLE, D. (1992). The strength of the therapeutic alliance in three treatments for depression. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 31-36.
23. SAMSTAG, L. W., MURAN, J. C., & SAFRAN, J. D. (2004). Defining and identifying alliance ruptures. In D. P. Charman (Ed.), Core processes in brief psychodynamic psychotherapy: Advancing effective practice (pp. 187-214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. STILES, W. B., HONOS-WEBB, L., & SURKO, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 439-458.
25. WAMPOLD, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.